Compare K1 SE vs Q1 PRO
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | K1 SE |
Q1 PRO[BUY Q1 PRO] |
| Buy Filament forCreality 3D K1 SE | Buy Filament forQIDI Q1 PRO | |
| Estimated price | $349,00 | $449,00 |
| Manufacturer | Creality 3D | QIDI |
| Release Year | 2023 | 2024 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 245x245x245 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 355x355x480 | 467x477x489 |
| Weight [kg] | 10,24 | 20 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | YES |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 300 | 350 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 120 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 600 | 600 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | YES | YES |
| Recommended filaments | Hyper PLA, PLA, PETG, PET, TPU | PLA、ABS、ASA、PETG、TPU、PC、PA、PA-CF、PET-CF、PAHT-CF etc. |
| Recommended slicers | Creality Print; Cura, Simplify3D e PrusaSlicer | QIDI Slicer/Cura/Simplify 3D/ORCA/PRUSA Slicer |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | Cortex-A53，64-bit Processor | |
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Touchscreen 4,3'' |
| Power Supply | 110/220V / 350W | 350 W |
| Connectivity | Ethernet / USB / Wi-Fi | WiFi/USB Flash Drive/Ethernet Cable |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Linux, Macbook |
| Date of registration in the system | 2023-08-26 | 2024-07-09 |
| Release date | 2023 | 2024 |
| Extra features | The Creality K1 SE is a high-speed 3D printer with CoreXY system, capable of printing at up to 600mm/s with acceleration of 20000mm/s². It has a dual-gear extruder, easy-to-replace tri-metal nozzle, automatic leveling, and advanced features such as vibration reduction algorithms and intelligent operation. Its rigid cast aluminum frame ensures stability, while the open-source Klipper-based system offers freedom for customization. It is pre-assembled for a simplified and fast user experience. | The QIDI Q1 Pro 3D printer stands out for its Core XY structure and heating chambers that reach up to 60ºC, ideal for advanced materials such as ABS and Nylon. It features Klipper firmware, an automatic leveling system, a high-flow extruder with a double metal nozzle and a hotend that reaches 350ºC. It offers connectivity via Wi-Fi, USB and Ethernet, as well as a 1080p camera for remote monitoring and an intuitive touchscreen for easy operation. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
| Hardware | 4.5 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 5 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| [BUY Q1 PRO] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Creality K1 SE and QIDI Q1 Pro 3D printers, both models deliver strong performance and feature sets tailored to different user needs. The K1 SE, with its competitive pricing and high-speed printing capabilities, caters to users who prioritize speed and efficiency, allowing for rapid prototyping and production. Its lightweight design and automatic features make it user-friendly, particularly for hobbyists and beginners. On the other hand, the QIDI Q1 Pro, while priced slightly higher, is designed for advanced users who require versatility in materials for their 3D printing projects. It offers a larger print volume and a robust feature set, including a heating chamber for better adherence of materials like ABS and Nylon. Its higher maximum temperature capabilities further enhance its adaptability to a wider range of filaments. Overall, if budget and speed are your primary concerns, the K1 SE presents an excellent value. Conversely, if you need a more versatile printer with expanded material capabilities and advanced features, the QIDI Q1 Pro is worth the investment. Ultimately, the decision between these two printers should hinge on individual project requirements, material preferences, and budgetary considerations. |