Compare S5 vs Q1 PRO
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | S5 |
Q1 PRO[BUY Q1 PRO] |
| Buy Filament forUltimaker S5 | Buy Filament forQIDI Q1 PRO | |
| Estimated price | $6950,00 | $449,00 |
| Manufacturer | Ultimaker | QIDI |
| Release Year | 2021 | 2024 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 330x340x300 | 245x245x245 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 495x585x780 | 467x477x489 |
| Weight [kg] | 20,6 | 20 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | YES | YES |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 280 | 350 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 140 | 120 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 80 | 600 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | YES | YES |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, ABS, PETG, PC, Nylon, Tritan | PLA、ABS、ASA、PETG、TPU、PC、PA、PA-CF、PET-CF、PAHT-CF etc. |
| Recommended slicers | Cura | QIDI Slicer/Cura/Simplify 3D/ORCA/PRUSA Slicer |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | Cortex-A53，64-bit Processor | |
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,7'' | Touchscreen 4,3'' |
| Power Supply | 110/220V / 500W | 350 W |
| Connectivity | USB / Wi-Fi | WiFi/USB Flash Drive/Ethernet Cable |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Linux, Macbook |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-08 | 2024-07-09 |
| Release date | 2021 | 2024 |
| Extra features | The Ultimaker S5 stands out for its easy loading and unloading of materials, automatic bed leveling and excellent print quality with resolutions from 60 to 400 microns. It has dual extruders, interchangeable print cores, advanced connectivity with Wi-Fi and LAN, and intuitive software. It includes a Wi-Fi camera for monitoring, a removable glass bed, and a large build volume, making it ideal for professional and creative environments. | The QIDI Q1 Pro 3D printer stands out for its Core XY structure and heating chambers that reach up to 60ºC, ideal for advanced materials such as ABS and Nylon. It features Klipper firmware, an automatic leveling system, a high-flow extruder with a double metal nozzle and a hotend that reaches 350ºC. It offers connectivity via Wi-Fi, USB and Ethernet, as well as a 1080p camera for remote monitoring and an intuitive touchscreen for easy operation. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 2 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
| Hardware | 4.2 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 4 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| [BUY Q1 PRO] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Ultimaker S5 and the QIDI Q1 PRO 3D printers, it is evident that both machines cater to different user needs and priorities in the realm of 3D printing. The Ultimaker S5, while significantly more expensive, offers vast capabilities suitable for professional users. It features a larger print volume, advanced connectivity, dual extruders, and exceptional print quality. The automatic bed leveling and a range of recommended filaments make it intuitive for users seeking high precision in their projects. However, it is important to note that the high price point may not be justified for hobbyists or those with simpler printing needs. On the other hand, the QIDI Q1 PRO presents a compelling value proposition at a much lower cost. Despite its smaller print volume, it incorporates advanced features such as a high-flow extruder that accommodates a wide variety of materials, making it versatile for different applications. Its high maximum nozzle temperature and efficient connectivity options further enhance its appeal. In summary, if budget is not a constraint and high-end performance is paramount, the Ultimaker S5 is an exceptional choice. Conversely, for those seeking a more affordable option without compromising too much on features and versatility, the QIDI Q1 PRO offers a robust solution with solid performance metrics. Hence, the decision ultimately hinges on the specific requirements and financial considerations of the user. |