Compare Photo Mono 4 Ultra vs Original Prusa MK4 3D Printer
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Photo Mono 4 Ultra[BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
Original Prusa MK4 3D Printer[BUY Original Prusa MK4 3D Printer] |
| Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra | Buy Filament forPrusa Original Prusa MK4 3D Printer | |
| Estimated price | $250,00 | $1099,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anycubic | Prusa |
| Release Year | 2024 | 2023 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 153x87x165 | 250x220x210 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 231x236x430 | 500x400x550 |
| Weight [kg] | 5 | 7 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,1 |
| Processor | Custom 32-bit xBuddy electronics with STM32 | |
| Display | Touchscreen 4.3'' | Display touchscreen 3,5'' |
| Power Supply | 240 W | |
| Connectivity | USB | USB / Wi-Fi / internet via Prusa Connect |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2024-12-13 | 2023-06-06 |
| Release date | 2024 | 2023 |
| Extra features | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra features 10K resolution (9024x5120) with 17x17um pixels and high light uniformity (>=90%) enabled by the COB system with Fresnel lens and uniformity algorithm. It offers a build volume of 153.4x87x165 mm and speeds up to 120 mm/h with high-performance resin. It includes assisted leveling, built-in Wi-Fi, and a redesigned platform for better adhesion and easy model removal. Additionally, it has a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. | The Original Prusa MK4 stands out with automatic first-layer calibration via Loadcell sensor, high-speed enabled by Input Shaper and Nextruder for precise prints. It includes quick-change nozzles, customizable UI, and Ethernet/Wi-Fi connectivity. It supports a wide range of materials, from PLA to flexibles. Equipped with a 32-bit xBuddy mainboard and precise stepper motors, it offers exceptional print quality, enhanced security, and remote printing options via Prusa Connect. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Hardware | 6.3 / 10 | 3.2 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 9 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
| [BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] | [BUY Original Prusa MK4 3D Printer] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra and the Original Prusa MK4 3D Printer, it becomes clear that both models cater to distinct user needs and preferences within the 3D printing space. The Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra offers an excellent entry point for hobbyists or beginners, given its lower price point and impressive 10K resolution. Its compact build volume makes it ideal for smaller projects, while features like assisted leveling and power loss recovery provide additional convenience during the printing process. Moreover, with a lighter weight and simple connectivity options, it is a user-friendly choice that emphasizes performance in detail and speed. On the other hand, the Original Prusa MK4 is designed for more serious users who demand higher versatility and performance. Although it comes at a significantly higher price, it justifies the cost with a larger print volume and enhanced capabilities, including automatic first-layer calibration and a broad material compatibility range. The connectivity options and advanced features like Input Shaper technology further elevate its print accuracy and efficiency, making it suitable for more complex and professional projects. In conclusion, your choice between these two printers should hinge on your specific requirements. If budget and high-resolution prints for smaller items are your primary focus, the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra is likely the better pick. However, if you seek a robust, feature-rich machine capable of handling larger projects and diverse materials, then the Original Prusa MK4 represents a worthwhile investment. Each printer excels in its domain, making the decision ultimately dependent on your individual printing needs and budget considerations. |