Compare Original Prusa MK4 3D Printer vs Photo Mono 4 Ultra
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Modelo | Original Prusa MK4 3D Printer[BUY Original Prusa MK4 3D Printer] |
Photo Mono 4 Ultra[BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
Buy Filament forPrusa Original Prusa MK4 3D Printer | Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra | |
Estimated price | $1099,00 | $250,00 |
Manufacturer | Prusa | Anycubic |
Release Year | 2023 | 2024 |
Print Volume [mm] | 250x220x210 | 153x87x165 |
Printer Size [mm] | 500x400x550 | 231x236x430 |
Weight [kg] | 7 | 5 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
Processor | Custom 32-bit xBuddy electronics with STM32 | |
Display | Display touchscreen 3,5'' | Touchscreen 4.3'' |
Power Supply | 240 W | |
Connectivity | USB / Wi-Fi / internet via Prusa Connect | USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac |
Date of registration in the system | 2023-06-06 | 2024-12-13 |
Release date | 2023 | 2024 |
Extra features | The Original Prusa MK4 stands out with automatic first-layer calibration via Loadcell sensor, high-speed enabled by Input Shaper and Nextruder for precise prints. It includes quick-change nozzles, customizable UI, and Ethernet/Wi-Fi connectivity. It supports a wide range of materials, from PLA to flexibles. Equipped with a 32-bit xBuddy mainboard and precise stepper motors, it offers exceptional print quality, enhanced security, and remote printing options via Prusa Connect. | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra features 10K resolution (9024x5120) with 17x17um pixels and high light uniformity (>=90%) enabled by the COB system with Fresnel lens and uniformity algorithm. It offers a build volume of 153.4x87x165 mm and speeds up to 120 mm/h with high-performance resin. It includes assisted leveling, built-in Wi-Fi, and a redesigned platform for better adhesion and easy model removal. Additionally, it has a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Hardware | 3.2 / 10 | 6.3 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 1 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
[BUY Original Prusa MK4 3D Printer] | [BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
Conclusion |
When comparing the Original Prusa MK4 and the Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra, several key differences emerge that cater to varying needs and preferences in the 3D printing community. The Original Prusa MK4 is a robust FDM printer known for its versatility and high-quality prints, making it ideal for users seeking a reliable workhorse that can handle a wide range of materials. Its larger print volume and advanced features like automatic first-layer calibration and customizable UI provide an excellent user experience. However, this comes at a higher price point, which may deter budget-conscious users. Its ability to connect via Wi-Fi and its support for various operating systems enhances its accessibility for different user setups. Conversely, the Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra presents an appealing option for those prioritizing affordability and high-resolution prints. With its impressive 10K resolution and quicker print speeds, it excels in producing intricate details, especially for resin-based projects, while remaining significantly lighter and more compact than the Prusa. Though it offers fewer features and a smaller print volume, its cost-effectiveness and ease of use make it an attractive choice for hobbyists and beginners looking for quality without breaking the bank. In conclusion, the choice between the two printers largely depends on individual needs. Those who require extensive features, larger build volumes, and flexible material options may find the Original Prusa MK4 worth the investment. In contrast, users focusing on budget-friendly, high-resolution prints and straightforward operation might find the Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra to be the better deal. Ultimately, both printers deliver quality results but cater to different user demographics in the 3D printing landscape. |