Compare Neptune 4 PRO vs K1 SE
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Neptune 4 PRO |
K1 SE |
| Buy Filament forElegoo Neptune 4 PRO | Buy Filament forCreality 3D K1 SE | |
| Estimated price | $359,00 | $349,00 |
| Manufacturer | Elegoo | Creality 3D |
| Release Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 225x225x265 | 220x220x250 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 475x445x515 | 355x355x480 |
| Weight [kg] | 8,9 | 10,24 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 300 | 300 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 110 | 100 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 500 | 600 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PLA+, TPU, PETG, Nylon, ABS | Hyper PLA, PLA, PETG, PET, TPU |
| Recommended slicers | Bambu Studio, Super Slicer, Cura, Prusa Slicer, Orca | Creality Print; Cura, Simplify3D e PrusaSlicer |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | ARM 64 bit | |
| Display | Touchscreen 4,3'' | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
| Power Supply | 310 W | 110/220V / 350W |
| Connectivity | USB, microSD | Ethernet / USB / Wi-Fi |
| Operating systems | Windows, Linux, Macbook | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2024-07-02 | 2023-08-26 |
| Release date | 2023 | 2023 |
| Extra features | The Elegoo Neptune 4 Pro stands out for its advanced features, including pre-installed Klipper firmware, a dual-gear direct extruder with a 5.2:1 ratio, a high-temperature nozzle (up to 300°C), a flexible magnetic PEI platform, efficient cooling fans, and a 121-point auto-leveling system. The printer also features a 4.3-inch touchscreen interface, dual linear bars on the X and Y axes, and a segmented heated bed for energy savings. | The Creality K1 SE is a high-speed 3D printer with CoreXY system, capable of printing at up to 600mm/s with acceleration of 20000mm/s². It has a dual-gear extruder, easy-to-replace tri-metal nozzle, automatic leveling, and advanced features such as vibration reduction algorithms and intelligent operation. Its rigid cast aluminum frame ensures stability, while the open-source Klipper-based system offers freedom for customization. It is pre-assembled for a simplified and fast user experience. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
| Hardware | 3.6 / 10 | 4.5 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 4 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Elegoo Neptune 4 PRO and the Creality 3D K1 SE, both 3D printers are modern and feature-rich, making them suitable choices for a variety of users. The Neptune 4 PRO offers advantageous features such as a high-temperature nozzle, an efficient cooling system, and a robust auto-leveling system, which enhances its usability and printing precision. Its slightly larger print volume can be beneficial for projects requiring bigger dimensions. On the other hand, the K1 SE excels in speed and performance, boasting impressive maximum printing speeds and acceleration capabilities that make it one of the fastest printers in its category. This printer also includes a sturdy aluminum frame and allows for significant customization due to its open-source nature. While both printers are similarly priced and have features like automatic bed leveling and filament end sensors, the K1 SE may offer better value for users prioritizing print speed and performance, while the Neptune 4 PRO may appeal more to those looking for reliability and a user-friendly experience with its advanced firmware and printing precision. Ultimately, the best choice between the two will depend on user priorities—whether it is performance and speed or advanced features and usability—which leads to a cost-benefit perspective that is quite similar for both models. |