Compare Mars 3 PRO vs Original Prusa MK4 3D Printer
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Mars 3 PRO |
Original Prusa MK4 3D Printer[BUY Original Prusa MK4 3D Printer] |
| Buy Resin forElegoo Mars 3 PRO | Buy Filament forPrusa Original Prusa MK4 3D Printer | |
| Estimated price | $300,00 | $1099,00 |
| Manufacturer | Elegoo | Prusa |
| Release Year | 2022 | 2023 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 143x89x175 | 250x220x210 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 227x227x438 | 500x400x550 |
| Weight [kg] | 5,5 | 7 |
| Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,1 |
| Processor | Custom 32-bit xBuddy electronics with STM32 | |
| Display | Touchscreen TFT 3,5'' | Display touchscreen 3,5'' |
| Power Supply | 240 W | |
| Connectivity | USB | USB / Wi-Fi / internet via Prusa Connect |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-07 | 2023-06-06 |
| Release date | 2022 | 2023 |
| Extra features | The Elegoo Mars 3 PRO printer stands out for its special features, such as its high printing resolution, which guarantees sharp and detailed prints with 35 microns. It includes a replaceable air purification module, which facilitates maintenance and improves air quality during printing. The device's LCD screen is scratch-resistant, increasing its durability, and a strong point is the uniform distribution of light, guaranteed by a Fresnel lens. This lens ensures more uniform curing of printed objects, contributing to superior print quality. With these features, the Elegoo Mars 3 PRO presents itself as a robust and efficient choice for resin 3D printing. | The Original Prusa MK4 stands out with automatic first-layer calibration via Loadcell sensor, high-speed enabled by Input Shaper and Nextruder for precise prints. It includes quick-change nozzles, customizable UI, and Ethernet/Wi-Fi connectivity. It supports a wide range of materials, from PLA to flexibles. Equipped with a 32-bit xBuddy mainboard and precise stepper motors, it offers exceptional print quality, enhanced security, and remote printing options via Prusa Connect. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Hardware | 1.4 / 10 | 3.2 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 9 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
| [BUY Original Prusa MK4 3D Printer] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Elegoo Mars 3 PRO and the Original Prusa MK4 3D printer, several key factors highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each model, ultimately guiding potential buyers in their decision-making process. The Elegoo Mars 3 PRO stands out for its affordability and impressive resolution, making it a particularly appealing option for those focused on high-quality resin prints. Its features, such as a scratch-resistant LCD display and uniform light distribution, contribute to exceptional print quality. However, it lacks advanced recovery features and has a more limited print volume, which could restrict its versatility for more extensive projects. On the other hand, the Original Prusa MK4, while significantly more expensive, offers a broader range of capabilities. With features like automatic first-layer calibration, high-speed printing, and enhanced connectivity options, it caters to users seeking advanced functionality and the ability to work with various materials. Moreover, its larger print volume allows for more substantial projects, though its performance ratings suggest that it may not match the print quality of the Elegoo in certain respects. Ultimately, the choice between these two printers depends on user priorities. For those on a budget who require high-resolution prints and primarily work with resin, the Elegoo Mars 3 PRO presents a cost-effective solution. Conversely, for users willing to invest in advanced features and greater versatility, the Original Prusa MK4 justifies its higher price with a more extensive range of functionalities. Both models have their merits, and choosing the best one will depend on individual printing needs and priorities. |