Compare M5 vs Ender 3 S1 PRO
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | M5 |
Ender 3 S1 PRO[BUY Ender 3 S1 PRO] |
Buy Filament forAnkerMake M5 | Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 3 S1 PRO | |
Estimated price | $497,00 | $499,00 |
Manufacturer | AnkerMake | Creality 3D |
Release Year | 2023 | 2022 |
Print Volume [mm] | 235x235x250 | 220x220x270 |
Printer Size [mm] | 502x438x470 | 450x49x620 |
Weight [kg] | 12,6 | 8,7kg |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
Bed type | Heated | Heated |
Power supply system | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 300 |
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 110 |
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 500 | 150 |
Filament holder | YES | YES |
Camera for supervision | YES | YES |
Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, ABS | PLA, PETG |
Recommended slicers | AnkerMake Studio (macOS, Windows), Simplify3D, Ultimaker Cura, PrusaSlicer | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
Processor | ||
Display | Touchscreen 4,3'' | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
Power Supply | 350 W | 350 |
Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB-C, OTA Upgrade | SD |
Operating systems | Windows, Linux, Macbook | Windows, Mac, Linux |
Date of registration in the system | 2024-07-08 | 2022-10-11 |
Release date | 2023 | 2022 |
Extra features | The AnkerMake M5 printer stands out for its impressive print speed, reaching up to 500mm/s. It features AI print monitoring, an integrated camera for creating timelapses, auto-leveling bed with pressure sensor, direct extruder, flexible PEI-coated build plate, and Wi-Fi and USB-C connectivity. Assembly is quick and easy, and the printer is designed to deliver high print quality and ease of use. | Creality's Ender 3 S1 PRO is an innovation in the Ender 3 series, featuring a Sprite Pro Extruder capable of reaching 300°C and dual lead screws on the Z axis, ensuring greater stability and print quality. Its PEI-coated print bed, combined with CR-Touch automatic leveling, provides excellent adhesion and ease of part removal. The user interface, via a 4.3-inch touchscreen, offers intuitive and efficient control, although it has some limitations regarding the handling of long file names and navigation. The well-designed extruder ensures effective cooling and handling of various filaments, although there may be a slight ghosting effect at high speeds due to its weight. This printer represents a balance between technological advances and operational challenges, remaining faithful to the quality expected of the Ender line. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Hardware | 4.5 / 10 | 3.2 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 4 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
[BUY Ender 3 S1 PRO] |
Conclusion |
In conclusion, both the AnkerMake M5 and Creality Ender 3 S1 PRO are solid choices for 3D printing enthusiasts, each with distinct advantages. The AnkerMake M5 excels in print speed and features, boasting a maximum output speed of 500 mm/s, which allows for rapid production without compromising on quality. Its user-friendly features, such as AI print monitoring and a flexible PEI-coated build plate, enhance the overall experience, making it well-suited for users seeking efficiency and ease of use. On the other hand, the Ender 3 S1 PRO, while slightly slower, offers impressive thermal capabilities with a maximum nozzle temperature of 300°C and a robust design that ensures stability during printing. Its improved extruder design and automatic leveling contribute to high-quality prints, albeit with some limitations in handling more complex navigation tasks. Considering the prices are relatively similar, the AnkerMake M5 offers a better cost-benefit ratio and performance speed, while the Ender 3 S1 PRO may appeal to those loyal to the Creality brand and prioritizing a reliable and stable printing platform. Ultimately, the decision between the two will depend on individual preferences, specific project requirements, and which features align best with one’s printing needs. |