Compare KP3S PRO V2 vs X1 carbon

Comparison between the best 3D printers

Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.

Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.

3D Printer KP3S PRO V2 3D Printer X1 carbon
Model

KP3S PRO V2

X1 carbon

Printing Material Filament Filament
Buy Filament for Kingroon KP3S PRO V2 Buy Filament forBambu Lab X1 carbon
Estimated price $229,00 $1449,00
Manufacturer Kingroon Bambu Lab
Release Year 2024 2023
Print Volume [mm] 220x220x250 256x256x256
Printer Size [mm] 420x400x450 389x389x457
Weight [kg] 12,6 14,13
Power Loss Recovery NO YES
Enclosed printer NO YES
Bed Leveling Automatic Automatic
Filament End Sensor NO YES
Bed type Heated Heated
Power supply system Direct Drive Direct Drive
Standard nozzle 0,4 0,4
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] 260 300
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] 100 120
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] 350 500
Filament holder YES YES
Camera for supervision NO NO
Recommended filaments PLA, PETG, TPU PLA, PETG, TPU, PVA, PA, PA-CF, Nylon, PC
Recommended slicers Cura, Orca Slicer Bambu Studio, Super Slicer, Cura, Prusa Slicer, Orca
Maximum Resolution [mm] 0,01 0,1
Processor Quad ARM A7 1.2 GHz
Display LCD Mono Touchscreen 5''
Power Supply 300 W 350 W
Connectivity USB-C / MicroSD / Ethernet Wifi, Bambu bus, Cartão SD
Operating systems Windows, Mac, Linux Windows, Linux, Macbook
Date of registration in the system 2025-03-18 2024-04-10
Release date 2024 2023
Extra features The Kingroon KP3S Pro V2 is a high-speed FDM 3D printer with Klipper firmware, ensuring fast and precise prints. It features linear rails on all axes, a Direct Drive extruder with a 9.5:1 gear ratio, and an efficient ceramic heater. It includes an inductive sensor for automatic bed leveling, a PEI magnetic bed, a built-in accelerometer for vibration calibration, and Wi-Fi, Ethernet, and USB connectivity for remote control. The Bambu Lab X1 Carbon revolutionizes 3D printing with stunning design, high print speeds, and a streamlined user experience. It stands out with its CoreXY system, a hotend capable of reaching 300°C, allowing for a wide range of filaments. Its LiDAR-assisted bed leveling system, vibration compensation, and AMS multicolor printing capability raise the industry standard. Print quality is impressive, with the ability to fine-tune for perfection. The X1 Carbon, with its closed build volume, not only promises but also delivers one of the most advanced 3D printing experiences available to consumers.
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) NO YES

Notes *

Cost-benefit 7 / 10 7 / 10
Hardware 0.9 / 10 6.4 / 10
Tela . .
Print volume 3 / 10 4 / 10
Performance 3 / 10 4 / 10

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Kingroon KP3S Pro V2 and the Bambu Lab X1 Carbon represent two distinct approaches to 3D printing, catering to different audiences and needs. The KP3S Pro V2 is positioned as a budget-friendly option, offering solid features such as automatic bed leveling and a decent print volume, while being lightweight and compact. Its straightforward design and lower price point make it a suitable choice for hobbyists and those new to 3D printing who prioritize cost-effectiveness.

Conversely, the X1 Carbon justifies its higher price with advanced features and capabilities, like a closed build volume, enhanced temperature range, and superior print speeds. This printer is designed for users seeking high performance and versatility, supporting a wider array of materials and delivering exceptional print quality. Its robust features, including LiDAR-assisted bed leveling and multicolor printing, position it at the forefront of 3D printing technology.

Ultimately, the choice between these two models hinges on the user’s budget and requirements. For those who value affordability and simplicity, the KP3S Pro V2 is an excellent entry-level option. On the other hand, serious enthusiasts and professionals who require advanced functionality and the ability to work with various materials will find the Bambu Lab X1 Carbon a worthwhile investment. Both printers exhibit commendable performance in their respective categories, earning equal marks for cost-benefit considerations despite their differing approaches.