Compare KP3S PRO V2 vs Q1 PRO
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Model | KP3S PRO V2 |
Q1 PRO[BUY Q1 PRO] |
| Printing Material | Filament | Filament |
| Buy Filament for Kingroon KP3S PRO V2 | Buy Filament forQIDI Q1 PRO | |
| Estimated price | $229,00 | $449,00 |
| Manufacturer | Kingroon | QIDI |
| Release Year | 2024 | 2024 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 245x245x245 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 420x400x450 | 467x477x489 |
| Weight [kg] | 12,6 | 20 |
| Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | YES |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | NO | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 350 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 120 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 350 | 600 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, TPU | PLA、ABS、ASA、PETG、TPU、PC、PA、PA-CF、PET-CF、PAHT-CF etc. |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Orca Slicer | QIDI Slicer/Cura/Simplify 3D/ORCA/PRUSA Slicer |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,1 |
| Processor | Cortex-A53，64-bit Processor | |
| Display | LCD Mono | Touchscreen 4,3'' |
| Power Supply | 300 W | 350 W |
| Connectivity | USB-C / MicroSD / Ethernet | WiFi/USB Flash Drive/Ethernet Cable |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Linux, Macbook |
| Date of registration in the system | 2025-03-18 | 2024-07-09 |
| Release date | 2024 | 2024 |
| Extra features | The Kingroon KP3S Pro V2 is a high-speed FDM 3D printer with Klipper firmware, ensuring fast and precise prints. It features linear rails on all axes, a Direct Drive extruder with a 9.5:1 gear ratio, and an efficient ceramic heater. It includes an inductive sensor for automatic bed leveling, a PEI magnetic bed, a built-in accelerometer for vibration calibration, and Wi-Fi, Ethernet, and USB connectivity for remote control. | The QIDI Q1 Pro 3D printer stands out for its Core XY structure and heating chambers that reach up to 60ºC, ideal for advanced materials such as ABS and Nylon. It features Klipper firmware, an automatic leveling system, a high-flow extruder with a double metal nozzle and a hotend that reaches 350ºC. It offers connectivity via Wi-Fi, USB and Ethernet, as well as a 1080p camera for remote monitoring and an intuitive touchscreen for easy operation. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
| Hardware | 0.9 / 10 | 5.4 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 3 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| [BUY Q1 PRO] |
Conclusion |
| In conclusion, when comparing the KP3S PRO V2 and the Q1 PRO, several key factors highlight their respective advantages and disadvantages. The KP3S PRO V2 emerges as a more cost-effective option, delivering impressive speed and a compact print volume, suitable for standard materials like PLA and PETG. However, it lacks advanced features such as power loss recovery and filament end sensors, which may limit its usability for more demanding projects. On the other hand, the Q1 PRO, while priced higher, offers superior versatility with its larger print volume, compatibility with a wider range of advanced materials, and essential features including power loss recovery, a filament end sensor, and a touchscreen interface for enhanced user experience. Its Core XY structure and higher maximum nozzle temperature make it an attractive choice for users looking to experiment with more complex prints. Ultimately, the decision depends on the user's specific needs: the KP3S PRO V2 is ideal for those seeking a budget-friendly and efficient printer for general use, while the Q1 PRO is better suited for advanced users who require greater functionality and material compatibility. Thus, choosing between these two printers should be guided by the project's requirements and the user's budget considerations. |