Compare K1 vs K1 SE
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | K1[BUY K1] |
K1 SE |
| Buy Filament forCreality 3D K1 | Buy Filament forCreality 3D K1 SE | |
| Estimated price | $399,00 | $349,00 |
| Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Creality 3D |
| Release Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 220x220x250 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 355x355x480 | 355x355x480 |
| Weight [kg] | 12,5 | 10,24 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | YES | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 300 | 300 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 120 | 100 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 600 | 600 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | YES | YES |
| Recommended filaments | ABS, PLA, PETG, PET, TPU, PA, ABS, ASA, PC, PLA-CF, PA-CF, PET-CF | Hyper PLA, PLA, PETG, PET, TPU |
| Recommended slicers | Creality Print; Cura, Simplify3D e PrusaSlicer | Creality Print; Cura, Simplify3D e PrusaSlicer |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
| Power Supply | 110/220V / 350W | 110/220V / 350W |
| Connectivity | Ethernet / USB / Wi-Fi | Ethernet / USB / Wi-Fi |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2023-04-17 | 2023-08-26 |
| Release date | 2023 | 2023 |
| Extra features | The K1 is an extremely fast FDM 3D printer, reaching 600mm/s, 12 times faster than standard models. Equipped with a Core XY system and lightweight print head, it offers energy efficiency and high print quality. It stands out for its dual-gear extruder and quickly heated hotend, as well as dual cooling to prevent warping. Its robust structure ensures stability at high speed, with optimized software to speed up the printing process. | The Creality K1 SE is a high-speed 3D printer with CoreXY system, capable of printing at up to 600mm/s with acceleration of 20000mm/s². It has a dual-gear extruder, easy-to-replace tri-metal nozzle, automatic leveling, and advanced features such as vibration reduction algorithms and intelligent operation. Its rigid cast aluminum frame ensures stability, while the open-source Klipper-based system offers freedom for customization. It is pre-assembled for a simplified and fast user experience. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
| Hardware | 5.4 / 10 | 4.5 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 5 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| [BUY K1] |
Conclusion |
| In conclusion, when comparing the Creality 3D K1 and K1 SE, both models present distinct advantages that cater to different user needs. The K1, while slightly higher in price, offers an enclosed build, which can be beneficial for temperature-sensitive materials and provides a more controlled printing environment. Its robust structure, dual-gear extruder, and advanced features make it a strong contender for users focused on high-speed and quality prints. On the other hand, the K1 SE, being a more affordable option, retains similar performance specifications and advanced technology such as the Core XY system and automatic leveling. Its open-frame design may appeal to users who prioritize accessibility and ease of use, especially with its pre-assembly for quick setup. While it supports a decent range of materials, it slightly lags in maximum bed temperature compared to the K1. Ultimately, both printers have excellent performance capabilities, but if an enclosed environment and slightly better maximum specs are priorities, the K1 is a superior choice. Conversely, if budget constraints are more significant, alongside the desire for a user-friendly experience, the K1 SE represents a solid option with competitive features. Thus, the decision hinges upon individual preferences regarding budget versus specific functionalities. |