Compare K1 SE vs Replicator Plus
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Modelo | K1 SE |
Replicator Plus |
Buy Filament forCreality 3D K1 SE | Buy Filament forMakerbot Replicator Plus | |
Estimated price | $349,00 | $2099,00 |
Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Makerbot |
Release Year | 2023 | 2016 |
Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 165x295x195 |
Printer Size [mm] | 355x355x480 | 410x528x441 |
Weight [kg] | 10,24 | 18,3 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
Bed type | Heated | |
Power supply system | Direct Drive | Bowden |
Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 300 | 230 |
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | |
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 600 | 150 |
Filament holder | YES | YES |
Camera for supervision | YES | YES |
Recommended filaments | Hyper PLA, PLA, PETG, PET, TPU | PLA |
Recommended slicers | Creality Print; Cura, Simplify3D e PrusaSlicer | MakerBot Print Software |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
Processor | ||
Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | |
Power Supply | 110/220V / 350W | 110/220V / 240W |
Connectivity | Ethernet / USB / Wi-Fi | USB / Wi-Fi |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
Date of registration in the system | 2023-08-26 | 2022-11-15 |
Release date | 2023 | 2016 |
Extra features | The Creality K1 SE is a high-speed 3D printer with CoreXY system, capable of printing at up to 600mm/s with acceleration of 20000mm/s². It has a dual-gear extruder, easy-to-replace tri-metal nozzle, automatic leveling, and advanced features such as vibration reduction algorithms and intelligent operation. Its rigid cast aluminum frame ensures stability, while the open-source Klipper-based system offers freedom for customization. It is pre-assembled for a simplified and fast user experience. | The Replicator Plus printer is easy to use and has very good print quality. Its software is user-friendly and powerful, with USB, Ethernet, Wi-Fi and support for printing via pen drive. With a safe design for an open frame printer, it is relatively quiet. The Smart Extruder+ detects filament end and pauses printing automatically, in addition to notifying via apps. It has a large print volume, with a non-heated and coated print bed for easy removal of parts. It also has a webcam for remote monitoring of prints. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
Hardware | 4 / 10 | 2.5 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 5 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Creality K1 SE and the MakerBot Replicator Plus, it becomes evident that both printers cater to distinct user needs and preferences. The K1 SE stands out with its modern design and advanced capabilities, such as a remarkably high maximum printing speed, a robust construction, and a versatile range of compatible filaments. Its features, including automatic bed leveling, a dual-gear extruder, and a large touchscreen interface, enhance user experience and operational efficiency. Moreover, its open-source Klipper-based system allows for a high degree of customization, appealing to tech-savvy users and enthusiasts. In contrast, the Replicator Plus, though released earlier and positioned at a significantly higher price point, offers solid print quality and ease of use. Its robust software, user-friendly interface, and useful functionalities—like automatic filament detection and remote monitoring—make it suitable for those seeking a straightforward, reliable printing experience without the bells and whistles of cutting-edge technology. In conclusion, the Creality K1 SE generally presents a more favorable cost-benefit ratio due to its superior performance metrics and modern features, making it an excellent choice for users who prioritize speed and versatility. The MakerBot Replicator Plus may appeal to users who prefer a tried-and-true design with solid performance, albeit at a higher cost. Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual preferences, budget considerations, and specific printing needs. |