Compare Ender 5 Max vs K1 SE

Comparison between the best 3D printers

Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.

Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.

3D Printer Ender 5 Max 3D Printer K1 SE
Modelo

Ender 5 Max

K1 SE

Buy Filament forCreality Ender 5 Max Buy Filament forCreality 3D K1 SE
Estimated price $769,00 $349,00
Manufacturer Creality Creality 3D
Release Year 2025 2023
Print Volume [mm] 400x400x400 220x220x250
Printer Size [mm] 649x721x850 355x355x480
Weight [kg] 25,9 10,24
Power Loss Recovery YES YES
Enclosed printer NO NO
Bed Leveling Automatic Automatic
Filament End Sensor YES YES
Bed type Heated Heated
Power supply system Direct Drive Direct Drive
Standard nozzle 0,4 0,4
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] 300 300
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] 100 100
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] 700 600
Filament holder YES YES
Camera for supervision YES YES
Recommended filaments Hyper PLA/PLA/PETG/TPU95A/ABS/ASA/PLA-CF/PA/PLA-Silk Hyper PLA, PLA, PETG, PET, TPU
Recommended slicers Creality Print 5.1 Creality Print; Cura, Simplify3D e PrusaSlicer
Maximum Resolution [mm] 0,1 0,1
Processor
Display Touchscreen 4,3'' Display touchscreen 4,3''
Power Supply 1250 W 110/220V / 350W
Connectivity USB, Wifi Ethernet / USB / Wi-Fi
Operating systems Windows Windows, Mac, Linux
Date of registration in the system 2025-02-18 2023-08-26
Release date 2025 2023
Extra features The Ender 5 Max by Creality features a 400 x 400 x 400 mm build volume, a rigid aluminum frame, and 36-point auto bed leveling. With speeds up to 700 mm/s, it boasts a hardened dual-gear extruder and a 1000W heated bed, reaching 80°C in just 200 seconds. It supports remote management via WLAN, a tri-color status indicator, and quiet operation, making it ideal for high-precision, high-productivity 3D printing. The Creality K1 SE is a high-speed 3D printer with CoreXY system, capable of printing at up to 600mm/s with acceleration of 20000mm/s². It has a dual-gear extruder, easy-to-replace tri-metal nozzle, automatic leveling, and advanced features such as vibration reduction algorithms and intelligent operation. Its rigid cast aluminum frame ensures stability, while the open-source Klipper-based system offers freedom for customization. It is pre-assembled for a simplified and fast user experience.
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) NO NO

Notes *

Cost-benefit 7 / 10 7 / 10
Hardware 5 / 10 4 / 10
Tela . .
Print volume 4 / 10 3 / 10
Performance 6 / 10 5 / 10

Conclusion

In comparing the Creality Ender 5 Max and the Creality 3D K1 SE, both models present compelling features tailored to different user needs in the 3D printing landscape.

The Ender 5 Max stands out due to its larger print volume of 400x400x400 mm, making it suitable for larger projects or more intricate designs. Its maximum printing speed reaches 700 mm/s, which, combined with a robust aluminum frame and advanced bed leveling capabilities, positions it as a solid choice for high-precision work. The model also offers a wider range of recommended filaments, thus facilitating versatility in printing materials.

On the other hand, the K1 SE, though it has a smaller print volume of 220x220x250 mm, benefits from a modern CoreXY system that enables faster printing with impressive acceleration and vibration reduction algorithms. This printer is designed for a simplified user experience with its pre-assembled construct and customizable open-source system. Its focus on speed and efficiency makes it a desirable option for users who prioritize quick turnaround times.

When examining cost, the Ender 5 Max, while more expensive, provides superior build dimensions and speed, appealing to more intensive projects, whereas the K1 SE offers a more budget-friendly entry point, making it accessible for beginners or those with less frequent printing needs.

Ultimately, the decision between the two models will rest on specific user requirements: if larger volume and speed are paramount, the Ender 5 Max is the better investment, while the K1 SE presents an excellent balance of performance and affordability for less demanding tasks. Both devices score similarly in cost-benefit, suggesting that users will be satisfied with either choice, depending on their unique needs in the world of 3D printing.