Compare Ender 3 S1 PRO vs Halot Mage S
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Modelo | Ender 3 S1 PRO[BUY Ender 3 S1 PRO] |
Halot Mage S[BUY Halot Mage S] |
Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 3 S1 PRO | Buy Resin forCreality 3D Halot Mage S | |
Estimated price | $499,00 | $549,00 |
Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Creality 3D |
Release Year | 2022 | 2024 |
Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x270 | 223x126x230 |
Printer Size [mm] | 450x49x620 | 333x270x608 |
Weight [kg] | 8,7kg | 12 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
Processor | ||
Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
Power Supply | 350 | 100 W |
Connectivity | SD | USB, RJ45 Ethernet, WiFi, Creality Cloid |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
Date of registration in the system | 2022-10-11 | 2024-09-25 |
Release date | 2022 | 2024 |
Extra features | Creality's Ender 3 S1 PRO is an innovation in the Ender 3 series, featuring a Sprite Pro Extruder capable of reaching 300°C and dual lead screws on the Z axis, ensuring greater stability and print quality. Its PEI-coated print bed, combined with CR-Touch automatic leveling, provides excellent adhesion and ease of part removal. The user interface, via a 4.3-inch touchscreen, offers intuitive and efficient control, although it has some limitations regarding the handling of long file names and navigation. The well-designed extruder ensures effective cooling and handling of various filaments, although there may be a slight ghosting effect at high speeds due to its weight. This printer represents a balance between technological advances and operational challenges, remaining faithful to the quality expected of the Ender line. | The Creality Halot Mage S is a resin 3D printer with a 14K (13320x5120) LCD screen and an integral 3.0 light source, ensuring precision and uniformity in layer curing. Its Dynax+ mode reaches up to 150mm/h without losing quality, while the laser printing platform improves adhesion. The HALOT OS system offers remote control via PC or cell phone, and the integrated air purifier neutralizes resin odors, making the environment more pleasant. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Hardware | 2.8 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 1 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
[BUY Ender 3 S1 PRO] | [BUY Halot Mage S] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Ender 3 S1 PRO and the Halot Mage S, both offerings from Creality 3D, we can draw a nuanced conclusion reflecting their strengths relative to their prices. The Ender 3 S1 PRO, while more affordable, excels in versatile filament printing with substantial print volume capabilities and crucial power loss recovery features, making it a reliable option for those who prioritize stability and ease of use in FDM printing. Its innovations, such as the advanced extruder, provide solid print quality albeit with some potential speed trade-offs. The overall design and functionality offer a strong entry point for both enthusiasts and newcomers to 3D printing. In contrast, the Halot Mage S steps into the spotlight with its advanced resin printing capabilities. The increased resolution and faster print speeds are notable advantages for users seeking higher precision and detail in their projects, making it ideal for intricate designs. Despite its higher price and a lack of power loss recovery, the enhanced technical specifications and the convenience of remote control contribute to its appeal. Ultimately, the choice between these two printers hinges on the user's specific needs: the Ender 3 S1 PRO is suited for those searching for a well-rounded and dependable FDM printer, while the Halot Mage S offers superior detail and speed for those invested in resin printing. Each model represents a strong value proposition in its respective category, encouraging users to align their purchase with their intended application and budget considerations. |