Compare CR10 SE vs Q1 PRO
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | CR10 SE |
Q1 PRO[BUY Q1 PRO] |
| Buy Filament forCreality CR10 SE | Buy Filament forQIDI Q1 PRO | |
| Estimated price | $386,00 | $449,00 |
| Manufacturer | Creality | QIDI |
| Release Year | 2023 | 2024 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x265 | 245x245x245 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 490x470x625 | 467x477x489 |
| Weight [kg] | 6,9 | 20 |
| Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | YES |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | |
| Filament End Sensor | NO | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 300 | 350 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 110 | 120 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 600 | 600 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | YES | YES |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, PET, TPU, PA Wood, ABS, ASA, PA, PLA-CF | PLA、ABS、ASA、PETG、TPU、PC、PA、PA-CF、PET-CF、PAHT-CF etc. |
| Recommended slicers | Creality Print, Cura, Simplify3D, PrusaSlicer, Orca Slice | QIDI Slicer/Cura/Simplify 3D/ORCA/PRUSA Slicer |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | Cortex-A53，64-bit Processor | |
| Display | Touchscreen 4,3'' | |
| Power Supply | 350 W | |
| Connectivity | USB, Wifi | WiFi/USB Flash Drive/Ethernet Cable |
| Operating systems | Windows, Linux, Macbook | Windows, Linux, Macbook |
| Date of registration in the system | 2024-07-02 | 2024-07-09 |
| Release date | 2023 | 2024 |
| Extra features | The Creality CR10 SE stands out for its printing speed of up to 600 mm/s, easy and intuitive assembly, direct extruder with double gears, hotend with hardened steel nozzle and ceramic heater, automatic leveling with CR-Touch and pressure sensor, and use of Creality OS firmware based on Klipper, with automatic input shaping calibration. It also includes Wi-Fi connectivity, a filament out-of-stock sensor and a robust structure with linear rails on the X and Y axes. | The QIDI Q1 Pro 3D printer stands out for its Core XY structure and heating chambers that reach up to 60ºC, ideal for advanced materials such as ABS and Nylon. It features Klipper firmware, an automatic leveling system, a high-flow extruder with a double metal nozzle and a hotend that reaches 350ºC. It offers connectivity via Wi-Fi, USB and Ethernet, as well as a 1080p camera for remote monitoring and an intuitive touchscreen for easy operation. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2.7 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 5 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| [BUY Q1 PRO] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Creality CR10 SE and the QIDI Q1 Pro, both printers exhibit strong performance in their respective categories, making them suitable choices for different users. The CR10 SE, priced more affordably, offers an impressive printing speed and user-friendly features such as automatic bed leveling and a robust build. However, it lacks certain advanced features such as an enclosed design and power loss recovery, making it more suitable for hobbyists or casual users who primarily work with standard materials. On the other hand, the QIDI Q1 Pro, although at a higher price point, brings advanced capabilities to the table. Its enclosed structure and power loss recovery feature make it a more reliable option for professional users or those interested in printing with engineering-grade materials like ABS and Nylon. The enhanced temperature capabilities and connectivity options further solidify its position as a versatile and efficient tool. Overall, the choice between the two largely depends on user needs and budget constraints. The CR10 SE is a great entry-level option, while the QIDI Q1 Pro caters to professionals seeking a more feature-rich printing experience. Both printers represent excellent cost-benefit ratios given their capabilities, but users should weigh their specific requirements against the associated costs to make the best decision. |