Compare BigTreeTech BIQU B1 vs Creality 3D Ender 6 vs Creality 3D Ender 3 V2 Neo
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
 |
|
| Model | BigTreeTech BIQU B1 |
Creality 3D Ender 6[BUY Ender 6] |
Creality 3D Ender 3 V2 Neo[BUY Ender 3 V2 Neo] |
| Printing Material | Filament | Filament | Filament |
| Estimated price | $269,00 | $499,00 | $310,00 |
| Date of registration in the system | |||
| Fabricante | BigTreeTech | Creality 3D | Creality 3D |
| Release Year | 2020 | 2020 | 2022 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 235x235x270 | 250x250x400 | 220x220x250 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 412x402x492 | 495x495x650 | 438x424x472 |
| Weight [kg] | 8,00 | 22 | 9,8 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | YES | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Manual | Manual | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Bowden | Bowden |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 250 | 260 | 260 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 100 | 150 | 80 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, TPU, ABS, PETG | PLA, TPU, ABS, PETG | PLA, PETG |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Kinematics | - | - | - |
| Extruder Type | - | - | - |
| Klipper Firmware | NO | NO | NO |
| Input Shaping | NO | NO | NO |
| Max Volumetric Flow [mm³/s] | - | - | - |
| Power Supply | 24V / 360W | 24V / 504W | |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | SD / USB | SD / USB |
| Release date | 2020 | 2020 | 2022 |
| Extra features | The BIQU B1 is an advanced 3D printer with a silent 32-bit BTT SKR V1.4 motherboard and ARM Cortex-M3 CPU, offering DIY interfaces (I2C, SPI, WiFi) and dual Z-axis. Its dual BTT B1 TFT35 V3.0 operating system allows real-time monitoring and multiple printing modes, including G-code visualization effects. It stands out for its BIQU SSS (Super Spring Steel), ensuring easy model adhesion and simplified removal, with the possibility of using it on both sides. It includes a filament sensor, automatically pausing printing in case of filament breakage. The multicolored RGB lights integrated into the hotend allow you to view the printing status even at night. Additional notes include the need for a BIQU-specific Type-C cable and extra interfaces for smart filament sensor and BL Touch. | The Creality Ender 6 stands out in the world of 3D printers with its CoreXY system, offering fast and high-quality prints. With a robust design, it has acrylic panels to protect against air currents, optimizing the printing of materials that require higher temperatures. It features a generic Creality hotend, effective up to ~240°C. Its differentials include 10mm GATES belts, promoting stability at high speeds, and a 360W power supply for reliable performance. The machine also has an intuitive user interface through a 4.3-inch touchscreen. | The Ender 3 V2 Neo printer stands out for its automatic bed leveling with the CR Touch system, ensuring high-quality initial layers. It features an all-metal Bowden extruder for increased durability and improved filament handling. Its flexible, PC-coated magnetic build plate makes it easy to remove prints and is durable and easy to clean. It also includes a new user interface with model preview and an updated gantry design. The Ender 3 V2 Neo maintains the same build volume and temperatures as the previous version, supporting popular filaments such as PLA and ABS. It features a quiet 32-bit mainboard and additional features such as a filament sensor, print recovery, simple 3-step assembly, an integrated toolbox, and belt tensioners. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO | NO |
Notes * |
|||
| Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 1 / 10 | 1.5 / 10 | 2.4 / 10 |
| Screen | . | . | . |
| Print volume | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Performance | 6 / 10 | 7 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| [BUY Ender 6] | [BUY Ender 3 V2 Neo] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the three 3D printers—BIQU B1, Creality Ender 6, and Ender 3 V2 Neo—several distinguishing features emerge that cater to different user needs and budgets. The **BIQU B1** is the most affordable of the trio, offering a solid set of features including a good print volume and power loss recovery. However, its manual bed leveling and lack of an enclosure may hinder ease of use for some users, particularly beginners. Its primary strengths lie in its advanced motherboard and flexible printing options, making it a good choice for those who appreciate DIY capabilities and are comfortable with a bit of fine-tuning. On the other hand, the **Creality Ender 6** stands out with its CoreXY system, which allows for faster printing speeds and a larger build volume. Its enclosed design aids in temperature control while printing with challenging materials, making it a great option for serious hobbyists or professionals who require reliability and high-quality prints. Additionally, its robust build and user-friendly touchscreen interface enhance the overall printing experience, albeit at a higher cost. The **Ender 3 V2 Neo** positions itself as a balanced mid-range option, featuring automatic bed leveling and a flexible magnetic build plate for easy print removal. While it shares a similar print volume to the BIQU B1, its automatic functions and updated design make it more user-friendly, especially for those new to 3D printing. It provides good value for its price and is capable of producing high-quality prints with various common filaments. In conclusion, if budget is the primary concern, the **BIQU B1** offers good entry-level features, while the **Ender 3 V2 Neo** provides enhanced usability at a moderate price. For those willing to invest more for top speed and reliability, the **Creality Ender 6** is the best choice, particularly for projects requiring advanced materials. Ultimately, the best option depends on the user's specific needs and level of expertise in 3D printing. |