Compare SV06 vs Photo Mono 4
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Modelo | SV06 |
Photo Mono 4[BUY Photo Mono 4] |
Buy Filament forSovol SV06 | Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 | |
Estimated price | $259,00 | $200,00 |
Manufacturer | Sovol | Anycubic |
Release Year | 2022 | 2024 |
Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 153x87x165 |
Printer Size [mm] | 497x388x610 | 300x300x480 |
Weight [kg] | 9 | 4 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
Processor | ||
Display | Mono | Touchscreen 2.8'' |
Power Supply | ||
Connectivity | SD / USB | USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac |
Date of registration in the system | 2023-03-02 | 2024-12-13 |
Release date | 2022 | 2024 |
Extra features | The Sovol SV06 printer stands out for having a direct-drive extruder, providing better performance when printing a variety of materials. It has linear rods for greater precision and smoothness in movements, as well as an automatic bed leveling system, eliminating manual adjustments. Its all-metal hotend supports a wide range of materials. The SV06 also features sensorless homing and Z-axis self-alignment, increasing reliability and ease of use. Compatible with Klipper software, it offers the possibility of upgrades to increase printing speed. | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 features 10K resolution (9024x5120), ensuring precise details with pixels of 17x17um. Its laser-engraved platform 2.0 offers excellent adhesion and easy model removal. Equipped with LighTurbo matrix lighting, it provides uniform illumination, reducing layer lines and rasterization. It has a print volume of 153.4x87x165 mm, 4-point manual leveling, and a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Hardware | 0.7 / 10 | 6.3 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 0 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
[BUY Photo Mono 4] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Sovol SV06 and Anycubic Photo Mono 4 3D printers, several key factors emerge that can guide potential buyers in making an informed decision. Firstly, the **price** differential tilts in favor of the Anycubic Photo Mono 4, making it a more attractive option for budget-conscious users despite its smaller print volume. The SV06, while slightly more expensive, offers a larger print volume and a direct-drive extruder, which enhances its capability to handle various materials effectively. When it comes to **features**, the SV06 impresses with its automatic bed leveling and all-metal hotend, leading to increased reliability and versatility in material use. In contrast, the Photo Mono 4 shines with its superior resolution and advanced lighting technology, boasting 10K resolution for exceptional detail in prints. Regarding **usability**, both models have power loss recovery capabilities. However, the SV06's more extensive operating system compatibility might appeal to a broader range of users across different platforms. The SV06 also benefits from its larger size, translating to a more robust build which may appeal to users looking for stability during operation. In terms of **performance**, the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 excels due to its high resolution and sophisticated lighting system, which can significantly improve print quality, making it more suited for detailed projects. Comparatively, the SV06, despite having lower performance ratings, offers a solid choice for general-purpose printing with a focus on various material compatibility. Ultimately, potential buyers should align their decision with their specific needs: if high detail and smaller print jobs are the priority, the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 presents itself as the superior choice. Conversely, for those who require more versatility and larger print volume, the Sovol SV06 offers features that cater to a wider range of printing tasks. Therefore, the best choice will depend on the intended use, budget, and preference for print quality versus material flexibility. |