Compare SV04 IDEX vs Genius Pro
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | SV04 IDEX[BUY SV04 IDEX] |
Genius Pro[BUY Genius Pro] |
Buy Filament forSovol SV04 IDEX | Buy Filament forArtillery Genius Pro | |
Estimated price | $259,00 | $309,00 |
Manufacturer | Sovol | Artillery |
Release Year | 2021 | 2022 |
Print Volume [mm] | 300x300x400 | 220x220x250 |
Printer Size [mm] | 653x625x803 | 430x390x590 |
Weight [kg] | 15 | 9,6 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
Bed Leveling | Autimático | Automatic |
Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
Bed type | Heated | Heated |
Power supply system | DIrect Drive | Direct Drive |
Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 240 |
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 120 |
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 120 | 150 |
Filament holder | YES | YES |
Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
Recommended filaments | PLA, TPU, TPE, HIPS, ABS, PETG, WOOD, PC, PA, PVA, ASA | PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS |
Recommended slicers | Cura, Prusa Slicer, Orca | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,1 |
Processor | Ruby 32bit | |
Display | Touchscreen 4,3'' | Touchscreen TFT 3,5'' |
Power Supply | 500 W | |
Connectivity | SD | SD / USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | |
Date of registration in the system | 2024-11-06 | 2022-11-07 |
Release date | 2021 | 2022 |
Extra features | The Sovol SV04 IDEX offers 3D printing with independent dual extruders (IDEX), enabling simultaneous multi-color or multi-material printing without filament waste. It features a 300 x 300 x 400 mm build volume, automatic bed leveling, and Titan direct extruders, ideal for flexible materials. Equipped with a flexible magnetic plate, filament run-out sensor, print recovery, and purge buckets for idle filament, it stands out as a versatile and practical option. | The Artillery Genius Pro is a standout 3D printer with a fast-heating AC tempered glass print bed and a sleek design with a black aluminum base and blue accents. It features a Titan-style direct extruder and a 32-bit Ruby mainboard. Despite its advanced feature set, it struggles to maintain print quality, requiring frequent adjustments and calibrations, and its glued glass bed makes cleaning and replacement difficult. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Hardware | 2.8 / 10 | 3.2 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 4 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 1 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
[BUY SV04 IDEX] | [BUY Genius Pro] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Sovol SV04 IDEX and the Artillery Genius Pro, both 3D printers cater to distinct preferences and requirements in the 3D printing landscape. The Sovol SV04 IDEX, despite its lower price point, offers a larger build volume of 300x300x400 mm, which allows for bigger prints and greater versatility. Its independent dual extruders provide the advantage of multi-color and multi-material printing, making it particularly appealing for users seeking more creative options without filament waste. Additionally, features like automatic bed leveling and flexibility with various filaments enhance its practicality for diverse printing needs. On the other hand, the Artillery Genius Pro, while slightly more expensive, showcases a sleek design and a user-friendly interface with its responsive touchscreen. It incorporates a fast-heating AC tempered glass print bed, which can improve efficiency; however, users may find it less forgiving in terms of print quality consistency, necessitating more frequent calibrations and adjustments. Ultimately, for those prioritizing a larger build volume and diversified material options, the Sovol SV04 IDEX emerges as the better choice. Conversely, if aesthetics and quicker warm-up times are higher on the list of priorities, the Artillery Genius Pro remains a solid contender. Each printer offers good value for their respective features, making the final decision dependent on individual use cases and preferences. |