Compare SV02 vs Kobra
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | SV02 |
Kobra |
| Buy Filament forSovol SV02 | Buy Filament forAnycubic Kobra | |
| Estimated price | $209,00 | $259,00 |
| Manufacturer | Sovol | Anycubic |
| Release Year | 2020 | 2022 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 280x240x300 | 220x220x250 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 539x493x710 | 486x430x486 |
| Weight [kg] | 11,86 | 7 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Manual | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | NO | NO |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 260 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 110 | 110 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 120 | 180 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS | PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
| Power Supply | 110/220V / 400W | |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | SD / USB |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-10 | 2022-11-09 |
| Release date | 2020 | 2022 |
| Extra features | The Sovol SV02 is a dual extrusion 3D printer with two inputs and one output hotend, silent motherboard and 4.3" color touchscreen. It includes a tempered glass platform for glue-free adhesion, dual Z-axis for more stability, and fast heating with Mean Well power supply. It has a resume printing function and support for upgrades, such as an automatic leveling sensor. | The Anycubic Kobra features automatic bed leveling and a direct extruder for easy filament handling. The print bed is coated with PEI on a flexible steel plate, improving adhesion and making prints easier to remove. The printer features sensorless homing and is designed to be easily disassembled for easy maintenance and customization. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 1.8 / 10 | 2.4 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 4 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Sovol SV02 and Anycubic Kobra 3D printers, both models offer distinct advantages catering to different user preferences and budgets. The Sovol SV02, launched in 2020, presents a larger print volume and is designed with a dual extrusion system, making it suitable for users looking to experiment with multi-material printing. It features a silent motherboard, fast heating, and a robust build, making it a great choice for those needing stability and versatility. However, its manual bed leveling requires more user involvement, potentially leading to a steeper learning curve for beginners. On the other hand, the Anycubic Kobra, introduced in 2022, is a more user-friendly option featuring automatic bed leveling and a direct drive extruder, which simplifies filament loading and improves print quality with flexible materials. Its slightly smaller print volume might not appeal to those requiring extensive build space, but its flexible steel build plate enhances print removal and improves overall usability. Additionally, the Kobra's design emphasizes ease of maintenance and customization. Considering the overall cost-benefit analysis and hardware performance, both printers rank similarly, yet the choice between them hinges on user priorities. If users value a larger build area and are comfortable with manual adjustments, the Sovol SV02 is a compelling option. Conversely, if ease of use and automation are your priorities, the Anycubic Kobra might better suit your needs. Ultimately, both 3D printers represent solid investments within their price brackets, catering to different segments of the 3D printing community while maintaining essential features for a wide range of projects. The decision should be based on individual requirements for print size, ease of use, and specific printing goals. |