Compare SV02 vs K2 Plus
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | SV02 |
K2 Plus[BUY K2 Plus] |
| Buy Filament forSovol SV02 | Buy Filament forCreality K2 Plus | |
| Estimated price | $209,00 | $1500,00 |
| Manufacturer | Sovol | Creality |
| Release Year | 2020 | 2024 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 280x240x300 | 350x350x350 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 539x493x710 | 495x515x640 |
| Weight [kg] | 11,86 | 33,5 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | YES |
| Bed Leveling | Manual | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | NO | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 350 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 110 | 120 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 120 | 600 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS | PLA, PETG, PET, TPU, PA, ASA, PC, PLA CE, PA-CF, PET-CF |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker | Creality Print 5, Bambu Studio, Super Slicer, Cura, Prusa Slicer, Orca Slicer |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Touchscreen 4,3'' |
| Power Supply | 1200 W | |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | USB / WIfi |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Linux, Macbook |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-10 | 2024-06-26 |
| Release date | 2020 | 2024 |
| Extra features | The Sovol SV02 is a dual extrusion 3D printer with two inputs and one output hotend, silent motherboard and 4.3" color touchscreen. It includes a tempered glass platform for glue-free adhesion, dual Z-axis for more stability, and fast heating with Mean Well power supply. It has a resume printing function and support for upgrades, such as an automatic leveling sensor. | The Creality K2 Plus 3D Printer stands out for its multicolor printing, large build volume (350x350x350 mm) and Apus Direct Drive extruder with tri-metal protection nozzle. It features automatic anti-tilt leveling, FOC closed-loop motors and active chamber heating. In addition, it has an intelligent CFS filament management system, cameras for calibration and monitoring, a 4.3-inch touchscreen and advanced sensors to optimize the printing process. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | YES |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 1.8 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 4 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| [BUY K2 Plus] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Sovol SV02 and the Creality K2 Plus 3D printers, several key factors highlight their differing strengths and target audiences. The Sovol SV02 is an affordable entry-level machine that offers a decent print volume and essential features like a heated bed and dual extrusion capability. Its manual bed leveling and lack of advanced sensors may be suitable for hobbyists or those new to 3D printing. However, it has limited support for a wide range of materials and colors, and its overall performance and hardware ratings indicate it is less suited for professional or demanding applications. Conversely, the Creality K2 Plus delivers a comprehensive set of advanced features aimed at serious enthusiasts and professionals. Its larger build volume and automatic bed leveling provide enhanced usability, while the direct drive extruder and support for multiple colors and materials make it versatile for various projects. The improved performance metrics and innovative features, such as active chamber heating and intelligent filament management, justify its higher price point. In conclusion, if budget constraints and simplicity are your primary concerns, the Sovol SV02 serves as a viable option for beginners. However, for users seeking higher performance and advanced capabilities, the Creality K2 Plus presents a significantly better value despite the increased investment. Ultimately, the choice between the two should align with the user's experience level, intended applications, and appreciation for advanced functionalities in 3D printing. |