Compare S5 vs Core One
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | S5 |
Core One |
| Buy Filament forUltimaker S5 | Buy Filament forPrusa Core One | |
| Estimated price | $6950,00 | $1200,00 |
| Manufacturer | Ultimaker | Prusa |
| Release Year | 2021 | 2025 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 330x340x300 | 250x220x270 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 495x585x780 | 385x340x620 |
| Weight [kg] | 20,6 | 14 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | YES | YES |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 280 | 300 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 140 | 120 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 80 | 500 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | YES | YES |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, ABS, PETG, PC, Nylon, Tritan | PLA, TPU, TPE, HIPS, ABS, PETG, WOOD, PC, PA, PVA, ASA |
| Recommended slicers | Cura | Cura, Prusa Slicer, Orca |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
| Processor | xBuddy 32 bit | |
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,7'' | Touchscreen 3,5'' |
| Power Supply | 110/220V / 500W | 240 W |
| Connectivity | USB / Wi-Fi | SD |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Linux e Macbook |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-08 | 2024-11-27 |
| Release date | 2021 | 2025 |
| Extra features | The Ultimaker S5 stands out for its easy loading and unloading of materials, automatic bed leveling and excellent print quality with resolutions from 60 to 400 microns. It has dual extruders, interchangeable print cores, advanced connectivity with Wi-Fi and LAN, and intuitive software. It includes a Wi-Fi camera for monitoring, a removable glass bed, and a large build volume, making it ideal for professional and creative environments. | The Prusa Core One is a CoreXY 3D printer featuring a robust steel frame, a 3.5" touchscreen, and a heated chamber for technical filaments. It offers 360° cooling for improved print quality and supports upgrades from the MK4S model. With a compact design, a print volume of 270x250x220 mm, and compatibility with the MMU3 for multi-color printing, it stands out for its ease of maintenance, precision, and speeds up to 260% faster than the MK3S+. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | YES |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 2 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 3.6 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 4 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Ultimaker S5 and the Prusa Core One, significant differences emerge that cater to varying user needs and budgets. The Ultimaker S5 is a high-end printer designed for professional applications, boasting a larger print volume, advanced features like dual extruders, and an extensive range of compatible materials. Its build quality and print resolution options make it ideal for precision-oriented endeavors, making it suitable for professionals in creative fields. However, this comes at a higher price point, indicating a less favorable cost-benefit ratio. On the other hand, the Prusa Core One, while more affordable, still offers robust performance and a host of features that appeal to both hobbyists and semi-professionals. Its compact design, ease of maintenance, and adaptability to a variety of materials position it as a solid choice for those looking for good performance without breaking the bank. Additionally, it supports multi-color printing, further enhancing its versatility. Ultimately, the choice between these two printers hinges on the user's specific requirements and budget constraints. For those prioritizing professional-grade specifications and results, the Ultimaker S5 is an excellent option. Conversely, the Prusa Core One presents a compelling alternative for budget-conscious users who still seek quality and functionality in their 3D printing projects. Thus, both models have their merits and cater to different segments of the market effectively. |