Compare Photon M3 Premium vs Comgrow T300
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | Photon M3 Premium[BUY Photon M3 Premium] |
Comgrow T300 |
Buy Resin forAnycubic Photon M3 Premium | Buy Filament forSovol Comgrow T300 | |
Estimated price | $600,00 | $449,00 |
Manufacturer | Anycubic | Sovol |
Release Year | 2022 | 2024 |
Print Volume [mm] | 123x219x250 | 300x300x350 |
Printer Size [mm] | 330x350x630 | 503x631x831 |
Weight [kg] | 19 | 17 |
Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,1 |
Processor | 64 bit | |
Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Touchscreen 5'' |
Power Supply | 150 W | 150 W |
Connectivity | USB / Wi-Fi | USB, WiFi |
Operating systems | Windows, Linux, Macbook | |
Date of registration in the system | 2023-01-19 | 2024-05-10 |
Release date | 2022 | 2024 |
Extra features | The Anycubic Photon M3 Premium Printer features MSLA technology with a 10-inch monochrome LCD screen and 8K resolution, ensuring prints with fine details thanks to the 28.5 micron resolution. It has a generous build volume (219 x 123 x 250 mm), an intelligent cooling system for greater durability, and a laser-etched build plate for better adhesion. It offers dual air filters, reducing odors, and the promise of compatibility with the Anycubic Cloud app. Its design includes an Art Deco-style UV curved glass and an efficient leveling system for the build platform. | The Sovol Comgrow T300 printer stands out for its technological innovations and advanced features. With a print size of 300mm300mm350mm, the T300 offers true linear rails on all axes, ensuring greater stability. Its Klipper-based intelligent core and 64-bit microcomputer increase printing speed and quality through pressure advancement and input shaping. The extruder with a gear ratio of 6.5:1 allows for more precise material control, optimizing the printing of flexible materials. In addition, the T300 features a rapid filament cooling system with a high-speed fan and a circular duct piece that improves cooling efficiency. With a 4.3-inch high-refresh rate touchscreen and an 81-point automatic leveling system, the T300 simplifies the preparation and execution of 3D prints. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Hardware | 4 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Performance | 9 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
[BUY Photon M3 Premium] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Anycubic Photon M3 Premium and the Sovol Comgrow T300, it's clear that each printer has its strengths tailored to different user needs and preferences. The **Photon M3 Premium** excels in producing high-resolution prints with its advanced MSLA technology and impressive detail capability, making it an ideal choice for users focused on intricate designs and professional quality. Its unique features, such as the intelligent cooling system and compatibility with the Anycubic Cloud app, enhance user experience but come at a higher price point. However, its smaller print volume may limit larger project possibilities. In contrast, the **Sovol Comgrow T300** offers a larger print volume, making it suitable for those looking for versatility in project sizes. Its technological innovations, including true linear rails and a Klipper-based core, contribute to enhanced stability and speed, which can be particularly appealing for more experienced users looking to optimize their printing operations. Notably, the T300 also includes power loss recovery, which may provide additional peace of mind during longer print jobs. Taking into account cost-efficiency, the **Comgrow T300** receives a higher rating, offering balanced performance and a larger print capacity at a lower price. Therefore, if budget and flexibility in print size are priorities, the T300 would be the preferred option. Conversely, if precision and detail in printing are paramount, despite the higher cost, the Photon M3 Premium represents an excellent choice. Ultimately, the decision between the two models hinges on the specific requirements of the user: precision and detail or larger print volumes and speed. Each model has its place in the 3D printing landscape, catering to different segments of enthusiasts and professionals alike. |