Compare Photon M3 Premium vs BIQU B1

Comparison between the best 3D printers

Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.

Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.

3D Printer Photon M3 Premium 3D Printer BIQU B1
Modelo

Photon M3 Premium

 [BUY Photon M3 Premium]

BIQU B1

Buy Resin forAnycubic Photon M3 Premium Buy Filament forBigTreeTech BIQU B1
Estimated price $600,00 $269,00
Manufacturer Anycubic BigTreeTech
Release Year 2022 2020
Print Volume [mm] 123x219x250 235x235x270
Printer Size [mm] 330x350x630 412x402x492
Weight [kg] 19 8,00
Power Loss Recovery NO YES
Maximum Resolution [mm] 0,01 0,1
Processor 32 Bits BTT SKR V 1.4
Display Display touchscreen 4,3'' Touchscreen TFT 3,5''
Power Supply 150 W 24V / 360W
Connectivity USB / Wi-Fi SD / USB
Operating systems Windows, Mac, Linux
Date of registration in the system 2023-01-19 2021-04-14
Release date 2022 2020
Extra features The Anycubic Photon M3 Premium Printer features MSLA technology with a 10-inch monochrome LCD screen and 8K resolution, ensuring prints with fine details thanks to the 28.5 micron resolution. It has a generous build volume (219 x 123 x 250 mm), an intelligent cooling system for greater durability, and a laser-etched build plate for better adhesion. It offers dual air filters, reducing odors, and the promise of compatibility with the Anycubic Cloud app. Its design includes an Art Deco-style UV curved glass and an efficient leveling system for the build platform. The BIQU B1 is an advanced 3D printer with a silent 32-bit BTT SKR V1.4 motherboard and ARM Cortex-M3 CPU, offering DIY interfaces (I2C, SPI, WiFi) and dual Z-axis. Its dual BTT B1 TFT35 V3.0 operating system allows real-time monitoring and multiple printing modes, including G-code visualization effects. It stands out for its BIQU SSS (Super Spring Steel), ensuring easy model adhesion and simplified removal, with the possibility of using it on both sides. It includes a filament sensor, automatically pausing printing in case of filament breakage. The multicolored RGB lights integrated into the hotend allow you to view the printing status even at night. Additional notes include the need for a BIQU-specific Type-C cable and extra interfaces for smart filament sensor and BL Touch.
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) NO NO

Notes *

Cost-benefit 7 / 10 6 / 10
Hardware 4 / 10 2.4 / 10
Tela . .
Print volume 3 / 10 3 / 10
Performance 9 / 10 0 / 10
 [BUY Photon M3 Premium]

Conclusion

In comparing the Anycubic Photon M3 Premium and the BIQU B1, several key factors emerge that can guide potential buyers in selecting the most suitable 3D printer for their needs.

The Anycubic Photon M3 Premium, while it comes at a higher price point, offers advanced features such as MSLA technology, an impressive 8K resolution capability, and a build volume well-suited for intricate designs. Its power loss recovery feature, intelligent cooling system, and compatibility with the Anycubic Cloud app make it an excellent choice for users focusing on precision and detail in printing. The printer's design and additional features, like dual air filters and effective leveling systems, further enhance its appeal for users who prioritize high-quality output and usability.

On the other hand, the BIQU B1 presents itself as a more affordable option, ideal for those who are either new to 3D printing or are looking for a capable machine without breaking the bank. The printer's larger print volume and user-friendly features, such as real-time monitoring and filament sensor capabilities, add to its convenience. While it may not match the Photon M3 Premium in terms of print resolution and performance, the BIQU B1 provides solid hardware at a lower cost and is suitable for hobbyists seeking a versatile and functional printer.

Overall, if precision, detail, and cutting-edge technology are the primary considerations, the Anycubic Photon M3 Premium stands out as the premium choice. However, for those seeking a reliable and capable 3D printer at a budget-friendly price, the BIQU B1 offers a commendable balance of features and performance. Ultimately, the decision should be based on the user’s specific printing needs, budget constraints, and desired outcomes.