Compare Photon M3 Plus vs Halot One
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | Photon M3 Plus |
Halot One |
Buy Resin forAnycubic Photon M3 Plus | Buy Resin forCreality 3D Halot One | |
Estimated price | $430,00 | $250,00 |
Manufacturer | Anycubic | Creality 3D |
Release Year | 2022 | 2021 |
Print Volume [mm] | 197x122x245 | 127x80x160 |
Printer Size [mm] | 290x360x475 | 221x221x404 |
Weight [kg] | 11 | 7,1 |
Power Loss Recovery | NO | NO |
Technology | LCD | LCD |
Screen Resolution | 6k | |
Max Print Speed [s/layer] | 1 | 1 |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 2k |
Processor | ||
Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | |
Power Supply | 150 W | |
Connectivity | USB / Wi-Fi | |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | |
Date of registration in the system | 2023-01-19 | 2022-10-11 |
Release date | 2022 | 2021 |
Extra features | The Photon M3 Plus printer stands out for its automatic resin filling system, capable of keeping the tank always full. It offers wireless connectivity and support for the Anycubic Cloud app, allowing remote control and monitoring, including with an optional camera. Its 34-micron resolution, provided by a 9.25-inch monochrome LCD screen, ensures high-precision prints. Printing speed is remarkable, with a layer curing in 1.5 seconds. Other features include a large build volume, laser-etched build plate, and compatibility with a wash and cure station. | Crealitys Halot-One printer stands out with several innovative features. It has a high-resolution touchscreen, providing an intuitive and responsive interface. Its quiet printing capability is remarkable, ideal for environments where noise is a concern. Assembly and setup are simple, with automatic functions facilitating quick start. Among its features, remote monitoring and adjustments via the Creality Cloud app stand out, simplifying remote print management. Replacing the FEP in the resin vat is easy, and the printer even includes extra FEP sheets. Top cover removal detection increases safety by automatically pausing printing. In addition, its integral light source promises high uniformity, optimizing print quality. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Hardware | 3.2 / 10 | 0.7 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 9 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Photon M3 Plus and the Creality Halot One, several factors emerge that highlight the strengths and considerations of each printer. The Photon M3 Plus, with its larger print volume, advanced automatic resin filling system, and high precision due to its 6k resolution capabilities, is an excellent choice for users looking for professional-grade prints. Its connectivity features, including wireless support and compatibility with the Anycubic Cloud app, add an extra layer of convenience for remote monitoring and management. These features may make it more appealing for serious hobbyists and professionals who demand high performance and efficiency in their 3D printing tasks. On the other hand, the Halot One presents a solid, budget-friendly alternative. Its intuitive touchscreen, ease of assembly, and quiet operation are attractive aspects for home users and beginners. The capability for automatic functions and the Creality Cloud app support make it user-friendly, allowing for a straightforward introduction to 3D printing. Although the Halot One offers a smaller print volume and lower resolution compared to the Photon M3 Plus, it still provides reliable performance at a more accessible price point. Ultimately, the decision between the two printers comes down to specific user needs and budget considerations. Those seeking larger, more detailed prints and advanced features may lean towards the Photon M3 Plus, while users prioritizing affordability, ease of use, and a solid foundational 3D printing experience may find the Halot One to be the better option. Each printer offers great value in its own right, with both scoring similarly on cost-benefit and performance, making them both worthy contenders in the market. |