Compare Photon M3 Max vs Photo Mono 4 Ultra
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Photon M3 Max |
Photo Mono 4 Ultra[BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
| Buy Resin forAnycubic Photon M3 Max | Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra | |
| Estimated price | $960,00 | $250,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anycubic | Anycubic |
| Release Year | 2022 | 2024 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 298x164x300 | 153x87x165 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 400x408x596 | 231x236x430 |
| Weight [kg] | 21 | 5 |
| Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
| Technology | LCD | LCD |
| Screen Resolution | 7k | 10k |
| Max Print Speed [s/layer] | 1 | 1 |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,01 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Touchscreen 4.3'' |
| Power Supply | 150 W | |
| Connectivity | USB / Wi-Fi | USB |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac |
| Date of registration in the system | 2023-01-19 | 2024-12-13 |
| Release date | 2022 | 2024 |
| Extra features | The Anycubic Photon M3 Max printer stands out for its large build volume of 298 x 164 x 300 mm, allowing the printing of large and detailed models. It has a 13.6-inch 7K monochrome screen, offering XY resolution of 46 microns, ensuring high-precision prints. It includes an innovative automatic resin refill system and a frosted glass-style FEP blade, improving part release. Its design includes a two-part acrylic cover, facilitating internal access, and a printing platform with aluminum side handles for easy handling. | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra features 10K resolution (9024x5120) with 17x17um pixels and high light uniformity (>=90%) enabled by the COB system with Fresnel lens and uniformity algorithm. It offers a build volume of 153.4x87x165 mm and speeds up to 120 mm/h with high-performance resin. It includes assisted leveling, built-in Wi-Fi, and a redesigned platform for better adhesion and easy model removal. Additionally, it has a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
| Hardware | 3.5 / 10 | 6.3 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 9 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
| [BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Anycubic Photon M3 Max and the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra, several key factors come into play that can help determine which printer may be the best fit for a potential buyer. Firstly, **price** is a significant consideration, with the Photo Mono 4 Ultra being far more affordable than the M3 Max. This makes it an attractive option for beginners or those with budget constraints. In terms of **print volume**, the Photon M3 Max excels, offering a larger build capacity that enables the printing of bigger and more intricate models. However, the Photo Mono 4 Ultra still delivers a respectable build size for smaller projects, making it versatile for its intended use. The **resolution** capabilities of both printers are noteworthy; the M3 Max features a 7K screen, while the Photo Mono 4 Ultra boasts an impressive 10K resolution. This difference suggests that the Mono 4 Ultra may provide finer detail and smoother finishes, which is a crucial aspect for users focused on high-quality prints. When it comes to **additional features**, the Photon M3 Max includes some advanced technologies such as an automatic resin refill system and a frosted glass FEP blade which enhances ease of use and print quality. Conversely, the Mono 4 Ultra offers power loss recovery and built-in Wi-Fi, making it user-friendly in terms of connectivity and operational efficiency. In terms of **support and usability**, both printers are compatible across multiple operating systems, but the M3 Max's heavier weight might make it less portable compared to the lightweight Photo Mono 4 Ultra, which could be a deciding factor for users with limited workspace. In terms of overall **performance metrics and cost-benefit analysis**, the Photo Mono 4 Ultra scores slightly higher due to its combination of affordability and impressive specifications. The Photon M3 Max, while powerful and capable of larger prints, does not significantly outshine the Mono 4 Ultra in other areas relative to its price. **Conclusion:** Ultimately, the choice between the Anycubic Photon M3 Max and the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra hinges on user priorities. If high print volume and advanced features are paramount, the M3 Max may justify its higher price. However, for those seeking affordability without compromising on resolution and essential features, the Photo Mono 4 Ultra presents a compelling option with its balance of performance and cost efficiency. Therefore, prospective buyers should assess their specific printing needs and budget to determine the best fit for their 3D printing projects. |