Compare Photo Mono 4 vs Mega S
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Photo Mono 4[BUY Photo Mono 4] |
Mega S |
| Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 | Buy Filament forAnycubic Mega S | |
| Estimated price | $200,00 | $149,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anycubic | Anycubic |
| Release Year | 2024 | 2019 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 153x87x165 | 210x210x205 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 300x300x480 | 405x410x452 |
| Weight [kg] | 4 | 14,5 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,1 |
| Processor | 8 bits | |
| Display | Touchscreen 2.8'' | Touchscreen TFT 2,8'' |
| Power Supply | 12V / 300W | |
| Connectivity | USB | SD / USB |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2024-12-13 | 2021-04-15 |
| Release date | 2024 | 2019 |
| Extra features | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 features 10K resolution (9024x5120), ensuring precise details with pixels of 17x17um. Its laser-engraved platform 2.0 offers excellent adhesion and easy model removal. Equipped with LighTurbo matrix lighting, it provides uniform illumination, reducing layer lines and rasterization. It has a print volume of 153.4x87x165 mm, 4-point manual leveling, and a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. | The Anycubic Mega S offers a printing platform with excellent adhesion, easy removal after cooling. It has a filament sensor for a better experience with flexible materials and a multilingual and intuitive color touchscreen. Assembly is quick, requiring only 8 screws and 3 connections. It has a large build volume (210 x 210 x 205 mm), high positioning accuracy and supports a variety of materials, including TPU, PLA, ABS and wood. It stands out for its solid metal structure, superior stability, high-quality printing with layer resolution of up to 50 microns, Ultrabase for easy adhesion and removal of parts, resumption of printing after power outage, high-quality extruder for flexible filaments, suspended filament support and stable structure that reduces shaking, improving printing quality. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Hardware | 6.3 / 10 | 2 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 9 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
| [BUY Photo Mono 4] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 and the Anycubic Mega S, it becomes clear that each printer caters to different user needs and preferences, striking a balance between cost, features, and print capabilities. The Anycubic Photo Mono 4, with its robust resolution and precision, excels in producing highly detailed prints, making it ideal for users focused on intricate designs and fine details. Its compact size, combined with features like easy model removal and effective power loss recovery, adds to its efficiency. Although its print volume is smaller than that of the Mega S, it compensates with superior performance and a higher cost-benefit rating. On the other hand, the Anycubic Mega S, while being an older model, offers a larger print volume and versatility with a variety of materials, appealing to users who may prioritize larger projects and flexible material options. Its solid construction and stable performance are significant advantages; however, it lacks the high resolution of the Photo Mono 4, resulting in lower overall print quality. Considering the price points, the Photo Mono 4 offers a better cost-benefit analysis for users focused on precision and detail, while the Mega S is a more economical choice for those needing a larger build volume and material versatility. Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual needs—whether one values detailed, high-resolution prints or the capacity to handle larger projects with various materials. |