Compare Photo Mono 4 vs LK4
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Modelo | Photo Mono 4[BUY Photo Mono 4] |
LK4 |
Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 | Buy Filament forLonger 3D LK4 | |
Estimated price | $200,00 | $200,00 |
Manufacturer | Anycubic | Longer 3D |
Release Year | 2024 | 2019 |
Print Volume [mm] | 153x87x165 | 220x220x250 |
Printer Size [mm] | 300x300x480 | 402x425x505 |
Weight [kg] | 4 | 7,8 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,1 |
Processor | 8 bits | |
Display | Touchscreen 2.8'' | Touchscreen TFT 2,8'' |
Power Supply | 12V / 360W | |
Connectivity | USB | SD / USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac | Windows, Mac, Linux |
Date of registration in the system | 2024-12-13 | 2021-04-15 |
Release date | 2024 | 2019 |
Extra features | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 features 10K resolution (9024x5120), ensuring precise details with pixels of 17x17um. Its laser-engraved platform 2.0 offers excellent adhesion and easy model removal. Equipped with LighTurbo matrix lighting, it provides uniform illumination, reducing layer lines and rasterization. It has a print volume of 153.4x87x165 mm, 4-point manual leveling, and a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. | The Longer LK4 is a versatile 3D printer capable of working with a wide range of filaments, such as PLA, ABS, TPU, copper, wood and carbon fiber, thanks to its 0.4mm nozzle and heated bed up to 110°C. With a printing accuracy of between 0.05-0.4mm, it stands out for its solid construction with an aluminum frame, weighing around 7kg, and a robust 24V and 15A power supply. The kit includes an Allen key, a 7/10 key, a microSD card with USB adapter, a spatula, cable ties, a power cable, 5m of filament and a spare filament end sensor. Assembly is simplified, with around 90% of the equipment pre-assembled, and detailed instructions assist in the process. Special features include print recovery after power failure, a filament end sensor, a super-adhesive printing surface and an intuitive color touchscreen display. The design features smooth profiles for easy assembly, and the position of the filament holder optimizes the filament path to the extruder. The LK4 is a solid choice for 3D printing enthusiasts looking for quality and versatility. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Hardware | 6.3 / 10 | 2 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 9 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
[BUY Photo Mono 4] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 and the Longer 3D LK4, both printers offer distinct advantages tailored to different user preferences and printing needs, while being priced similarly. The Anycubic Photo Mono 4 excels in resolution and detail, featuring a high maximum resolution of 0.01 mm, making it ideal for users focused on precision and intricate designs, particularly in resin printing. Its lightweight construction and compact build make it portable and suitable for smaller workspaces. Additionally, its enhanced features, such as the 10K resolution and efficient power recovery system, suggest a modern approach to 3D printing technology. Conversely, the Longer 3D LK4 shines in versatility and usability, accommodating a wide range of materials and boasting a larger print volume. With a resolution range that still allows for quality prints, it is a more robust machine for various applications. Its thoughtful design, including simplified assembly and included accessories, caters to users who appreciate a more hands-on experience in the setup and usage of their 3D printer. Ultimately, the choice between these two printers hinges on the user's specific requirements: the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 is suited for those prioritizing high-resolution prints and fine details, while the Longer 3D LK4 offers broader material compatibility and user-friendly assembly for general 3D printing enthusiasts. Both models present excellent cost-benefit considerations, making them worthwhile investments for their respective target markets. |