Compare Photo Mono 4 vs Halot Mage PRO
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Photo Mono 4[BUY Photo Mono 4] |
Halot Mage PRO |
| Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 | Buy Resin forCreality 3D Halot Mage PRO | |
| Estimated price | $200,00 | $479,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anycubic | Creality 3D |
| Release Year | 2024 | 2023 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 153x87x165 | 228x128x230 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 300x300x480 | 333x270x608 |
| Weight [kg] | 4 | 13,3 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
| Technology | LCD | LCD MSLA |
| Screen Resolution | 10k | 8k |
| Max Print Speed [s/layer] | 1 | 1 |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,01 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Touchscreen 2.8'' | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
| Power Supply | 150 W | |
| Connectivity | USB | USB / Wi-Fi / Ethernet |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2024-12-13 | 2023-12-18 |
| Release date | 2024 | 2023 |
| Extra features | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 features 10K resolution (9024x5120), ensuring precise details with pixels of 17x17um. Its laser-engraved platform 2.0 offers excellent adhesion and easy model removal. Equipped with LighTurbo matrix lighting, it provides uniform illumination, reducing layer lines and rasterization. It has a print volume of 153.4x87x165 mm, 4-point manual leveling, and a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. | The Creality HALOT-MAGE PRO is an advanced resin 3D printer, distinguished by its high build quality and detailed prints. It uses SLA technology with an 8K LCD screen, providing refined prints in a 228x128x230mm area. It offers an impressive printing speed of up to 170mm/h. Its design includes an automatic resin management system and an integrated air purifier, making it easier to use and reducing odors. Although it requires post-print cleaning, its intuitive interface and connectivity options such as cloud and LAN make the HALOT-MAGE PRO a robust choice for professionals and enthusiasts. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
| Hardware | 6.3 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 9 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
| [BUY Photo Mono 4] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 and the Creality 3D Halot Mage PRO, several key factors come to light that cater to different user preferences and needs in 3D printing. The Anycubic Photo Mono 4 stands out as a budget-friendly option, offering impressive 10K resolution at a compact print volume. It excels in features like power loss recovery and weighs significantly less, making it easier to transport and set up. Its touchscreen display, while smaller, facilitates user interaction, and its efficient matrix lighting reduces layer visibility, resulting in detailed prints. This printer is particularly suitable for hobbyists or those who prioritize cost-effectiveness without compromising on print quality. On the other hand, the Creality 3D Halot Mage PRO, albeit at a higher price point, provides a larger print volume, allowing for bigger projects and more intricate designs. Its advanced features, such as an automatic resin management system and integrated air purifier, enhance usability and comfort. The inclusion of multiple connectivity options, like Wi-Fi and Ethernet, makes it more versatile for professional settings. However, it does lack some features found in the Photo Mono 4, such as power loss recovery. In conclusion, potential buyers should consider their specific requirements when choosing between these two models. The Anycubic Photo Mono 4 is ideal for budget-conscious users seeking high detail in smaller prints, whereas the Creality 3D Halot Mage PRO offers a more robust feature set for those willing to invest more for greater volume and advanced usability. Ultimately, both printers provide excellent print performance, making them strong contenders in the realm of 3D printing. |