Compare Photo Mono 4 vs Ender 3 S1
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Modelo | Photo Mono 4[BUY Photo Mono 4] |
Ender 3 S1[BUY Ender 3 S1] |
Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 | Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 3 S1 | |
Estimated price | $200,00 | $399,00 |
Manufacturer | Anycubic | Creality 3D |
Release Year | 2024 | 2021 |
Print Volume [mm] | 153x87x165 | 220x220x270 |
Printer Size [mm] | 300x300x480 | 455x490x625 |
Weight [kg] | 4 | 9,1 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,05 |
Processor | ||
Display | Touchscreen 2.8'' | Display 4,3'' |
Power Supply | ||
Connectivity | USB | SD / USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac | Windows, Mac, Linux |
Date of registration in the system | 2024-12-13 | 2023-03-28 |
Release date | 2024 | 2021 |
Extra features | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 features 10K resolution (9024x5120), ensuring precise details with pixels of 17x17um. Its laser-engraved platform 2.0 offers excellent adhesion and easy model removal. Equipped with LighTurbo matrix lighting, it provides uniform illumination, reducing layer lines and rasterization. It has a print volume of 153.4x87x165 mm, 4-point manual leveling, and a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. | The Creality Ender 3 S1 printer stands out for its easy assembly and quiet operation. It has automatic bed leveling and a direct drive system, providing high-quality prints. The design is sleek, with flat cables in mesh sleeves and a magnetic bed. The Creality Sprite extruder is lightweight and developed in-house, supporting a maximum nozzle temperature of 260 degrees. It includes a filament run-out sensor and power loss recovery, with a dual Z-axis for greater support and stability. The build plate is flexible steel with PC coating, and the printer supports a wide variety of filaments. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Hardware | 6.3 / 10 | 2.4 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 9 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
[BUY Photo Mono 4] | [BUY Ender 3 S1] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Anycubic Photon Mono 4 and the Creality Ender 3 S1, both 3D printers cater to distinct user needs and preferences, each offering unique advantages informed by their specifications and capabilities. The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 impresses with its high resolution, achieving a maximum resolution of 0.01 mm, which enables it to produce intricate details and precise prints, making it ideal for users focused on producing high-quality models. Its compact print volume is well-suited for smaller projects and comes with features like a touch screen display for user-friendly operation, as well as robust power recovery options. Priced lower than the Creality model, it delivers an excellent cost-benefit ratio, particularly for hobbyists and those new to 3D printing who prioritize detail over size. Conversely, the Creality Ender 3 S1 offers significantly larger print dimensions, making it a better choice for users who require greater volume for their prints. Its distinctive features, including automatic bed leveling and a durable, flexible steel build plate, enhance the printing experience, especially for more experienced users looking to utilize a range of filament types. Although it has a lower resolution compared to the Photon Mono 4, its solid performance, easier assembly, and stability through its dual Z-axis are notable strengths. However, it is priced higher, which may be more justified for dedicated makers who anticipate using the printer for larger projects. In summary, the choice between the two models hinges on user priorities: the Photon Mono 4 excels in print quality and price, making it suitable for detailed projects, while the Ender 3 S1 provides greater versatility in print size and material options, catering to those with broader printing needs. Users should weigh the importance of resolution versus print volume in relation to their specific projects and budget when selecting the best 3D printer for their needs. |