Compare Photo Mono 4 Ultra vs S7
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Photo Mono 4 Ultra[BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
S7 |
| Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra | Buy Filament forUltimaker S7 | |
| Estimated price | $250,00 | $8300,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anycubic | Ultimaker |
| Release Year | 2024 | 2022 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 153x87x165 | 240x330x300 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 231x236x430 | 585x495x800 |
| Weight [kg] | 5 | 29 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,1 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Touchscreen 4.3'' | Display touchscreen 4,7'' |
| Power Supply | 500 W | |
| Connectivity | USB | USB / Wi-Fi |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2024-12-13 | 2023-01-28 |
| Release date | 2024 | 2022 |
| Extra features | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra features 10K resolution (9024x5120) with 17x17um pixels and high light uniformity (>=90%) enabled by the COB system with Fresnel lens and uniformity algorithm. It offers a build volume of 153.4x87x165 mm and speeds up to 120 mm/h with high-performance resin. It includes assisted leveling, built-in Wi-Fi, and a redesigned platform for better adhesion and easy model removal. Additionally, it has a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. | The UltiMaker S7 printer features a series of technological innovations to enhance 3D printing. It incorporates a flexible, magnetic build plate with PEI coating, promoting better adhesion and easier part removal. Its new inductive sensor significantly improves bed leveling, ensuring perpendicular and accurate prints. In addition, the S7 has a higher quality camera for remote monitoring, an integrated air filter, and uses a unique glass door to maintain a constant temperature in the print chamber. The machine is also compatible with the expansion kit for metal printing. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
| Hardware | 6.3 / 10 | 4.2 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| Performance | 9 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
| [BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
Conclusion |
| In conclusion, the comparison between the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra and the Ultimaker S7 highlights significant differences in both pricing and performance, catering to different segments of users in the 3D printing market. The Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra stands out as a cost-effective option, providing impressive features such as high-resolution printing, relatively compact design, and lightweight construction. Its auxiliary features, including power loss recovery and optimized adhesion systems, contribute to a favorable cost-benefit ratio, making it an ideal choice for hobbyists and smaller-scale projects. Conversely, the Ultimaker S7, while substantially more expensive, offers advanced technological innovations tailored for professional environments. With a larger print volume, improved build plate technology, and features enhancing print precision and monitoring, it serves as a robust solution for more complex and high-quality prints. Ultimately, the choice between these two printers should be based on the user's specific needs, budget, and intended applications. For those seeking affordability and decent performance, the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra is a strong contender. However, for professionals requiring extensive capabilities and reliability, the Ultimaker S7 justifies its higher price through superior functionality and versatility. |