Compare Photo Mono 4 Ultra vs Mega S
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Photo Mono 4 Ultra[BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
Mega S |
| Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra | Buy Filament forAnycubic Mega S | |
| Estimated price | $250,00 | $149,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anycubic | Anycubic |
| Release Year | 2024 | 2019 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 153x87x165 | 210x210x205 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 231x236x430 | 405x410x452 |
| Weight [kg] | 5 | 14,5 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,1 |
| Processor | 8 bits | |
| Display | Touchscreen 4.3'' | Touchscreen TFT 2,8'' |
| Power Supply | 12V / 300W | |
| Connectivity | USB | SD / USB |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2024-12-13 | 2021-04-15 |
| Release date | 2024 | 2019 |
| Extra features | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra features 10K resolution (9024x5120) with 17x17um pixels and high light uniformity (>=90%) enabled by the COB system with Fresnel lens and uniformity algorithm. It offers a build volume of 153.4x87x165 mm and speeds up to 120 mm/h with high-performance resin. It includes assisted leveling, built-in Wi-Fi, and a redesigned platform for better adhesion and easy model removal. Additionally, it has a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. | The Anycubic Mega S offers a printing platform with excellent adhesion, easy removal after cooling. It has a filament sensor for a better experience with flexible materials and a multilingual and intuitive color touchscreen. Assembly is quick, requiring only 8 screws and 3 connections. It has a large build volume (210 x 210 x 205 mm), high positioning accuracy and supports a variety of materials, including TPU, PLA, ABS and wood. It stands out for its solid metal structure, superior stability, high-quality printing with layer resolution of up to 50 microns, Ultrabase for easy adhesion and removal of parts, resumption of printing after power outage, high-quality extruder for flexible filaments, suspended filament support and stable structure that reduces shaking, improving printing quality. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Hardware | 6.3 / 10 | 2 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 9 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
| [BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra and the Anycubic Mega S, several factors come into play that can guide a purchasing decision. The Photo Mono 4 Ultra, released in 2024, boasts advanced technology with a remarkable maximum resolution and a high-precision printing capability due to its 10K resolution. Its smaller print volume may appeal to users needing detailed miniatures or specialized parts, while its lightweight design and built-in features like Wi-Fi connectivity and assisted leveling offer enhanced convenience. This printer is also noted for its exceptional performance, particularly in speed and print quality, making it a strong candidate for those prioritizing professional-grade results. On the other hand, the Mega S, which has been available since 2019, showcases a larger print volume and a solid construction that lends itself to stability during operation. While it offers lower resolution compared to the Mono 4 Ultra, it presents versatility through compatibility with a variety of materials and a user-friendly assembly process. The Mega S's features, such as a filament sensor and easy part removal, contribute to a satisfying user experience, particularly for hobbyists or beginners in 3D printing. When considering the cost-effectiveness, the Photo Mono 4 Ultra offers a higher performance rating at a slightly increased price, suited for those who seek superior detail and faster print times. Conversely, the Mega S may attract more budget-conscious consumers who value a larger build area and material versatility without the need for the finest details. In conclusion, the decision between these two models hinges on individual needs: choose the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra for high-resolution professional capabilities and cutting-edge features, or opt for the Anycubic Mega S for ease of use and larger prints at a more accessible price point. Each model represents a solid option depending on printing requirements and budget considerations. |