Compare Photo Mono 4 Ultra vs LK4 X
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Modelo | Photo Mono 4 Ultra[BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
LK4 X |
Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra | Buy Filament forLonger 3D LK4 X | |
Estimated price | $250,00 | $299,00 |
Manufacturer | Anycubic | Longer 3D |
Release Year | 2024 | 2022 |
Print Volume [mm] | 153x87x165 | 220x220x250 |
Printer Size [mm] | 231x236x430 | 465x485x615 |
Weight [kg] | 5 | 9,8 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,1 |
Processor | 8 bits | |
Display | Touchscreen 4.3'' | Touchscreen TFT 4,3'' |
Power Supply | 12V / 320W | |
Connectivity | USB | SD / USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac | Windows, Mac, Linux |
Date of registration in the system | 2024-12-13 | 2021-04-15 |
Release date | 2024 | 2022 |
Extra features | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra features 10K resolution (9024x5120) with 17x17um pixels and high light uniformity (>=90%) enabled by the COB system with Fresnel lens and uniformity algorithm. It offers a build volume of 153.4x87x165 mm and speeds up to 120 mm/h with high-performance resin. It includes assisted leveling, built-in Wi-Fi, and a redesigned platform for better adhesion and easy model removal. Additionally, it has a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. | Longer LK4 X offers intelligent 16-point auto-leveling and dual direct-gear extruders for precise filament control, compatible with multiple materials. It features an ultra-quiet 32-bit motherboard and open-source firmware, promoting creative freedom. Its PEI film platform ensures strong adhesion and easy model removal. Includes resume printing functions and filament out-of-stock protection. Assembly is simple, with 95% pre-assembled. It has a 4.3-inch touch screen, dual fan kit, low power consumption, manual belt tensioners and improved Teflon tube. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Hardware | 6.3 / 10 | 2.8 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 9 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
[BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra and the Longer LK4 X, several key points emerge to help guide your decision. 1. **Price Consideration**: The Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra presents a more affordable option, making it a better choice for budget-conscious users without sacrificing performance. 2. **Print Technology**: The Photo Mono 4 Ultra utilizes resin printing, which offers superior resolution (10K) and finer details, making it suitable for intricate projects. In contrast, the LK4 X employs FDM technology, which is versatile but generally results in lower resolution prints. 3. **Print Volume**: While the LK4 X has a larger print volume, the smaller dimensions of the Photo Mono 4 Ultra are suited for detailed works and smaller prints, which may be more compatible with the needs of certain users. 4. **User Features**: Both printers include power loss recovery features; however, the Photo Mono 4 Ultra stands out with its built-in Wi-Fi and high-performance resin compatibility, while the LK4 X offers advanced auto-leveling and a user-friendly assembly process. 5. **Weight and Size**: The Photo Mono 4 Ultra is noticeably lighter and more compact, making it more portable and easier to accommodate in smaller workspaces. 6. **Overall Performance**: The Photo Mono 4 Ultra is rated higher in performance and cost-benefit analysis compared to the LK4 X, indicating that it delivers greater value for its price, especially in print quality. In conclusion, if high-resolution prints and cost efficiency are your priorities, the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra is the better choice. Conversely, if you require a larger build volume and the flexibility of FDM printing, the Longer LK4 X may still be a viable option but at the cost of detail and overall print quality. Ultimately, choosing between the two should align with your specific printing needs and budget considerations. |