Compare Photo Mono 4 Ultra vs Kobra 3 Combo
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Modelo | Photo Mono 4 Ultra[BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
Kobra 3 Combo[BUY Kobra 3 Combo] |
Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra | Buy Filament forAnycubic Kobra 3 Combo | |
Estimated price | $250,00 | $450,00 |
Manufacturer | Anycubic | Anycubic |
Release Year | 2024 | 2024 |
Print Volume [mm] | 153x87x165 | 250x250x260 |
Printer Size [mm] | 231x236x430 | 452x504x483 |
Weight [kg] | 5 | 9,2 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,1 |
Processor | 32 bits | |
Display | Touchscreen 4.3'' | Touchscreen 4,3'' |
Power Supply | 400 W | |
Connectivity | USB | USB, Wi-Fi, Cloud |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac | Windows, Linux, Macbook |
Date of registration in the system | 2024-12-13 | 2024-06-27 |
Release date | 2024 | 2024 |
Extra features | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra features 10K resolution (9024x5120) with 17x17um pixels and high light uniformity (>=90%) enabled by the COB system with Fresnel lens and uniformity algorithm. It offers a build volume of 153.4x87x165 mm and speeds up to 120 mm/h with high-performance resin. It includes assisted leveling, built-in Wi-Fi, and a redesigned platform for better adhesion and easy model removal. Additionally, it has a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. | The Anycubic Kobra 3 Combo offers advanced features, including multi-filament printing with the ACE (Anycubic Color Engine) system, allowing for quick switching of up to four filaments. It features automatic bed leveling, nozzle clogging detection, and integrated filament drying during printing. The printer supports technical materials such as ABS, ASA, Nylon, and PC, thanks to the hotend that reaches 300°C and the heated bed up to 110°C. In addition, it has a 4.3-inch touchscreen and compatibility with various slicers such as Anycubic Slicer, Cura, and Orca Slicer. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | YES |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Hardware | 6.3 / 10 | 4.5 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Performance | 9 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
[BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] | [BUY Kobra 3 Combo] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra and the Kobra 3 Combo, it is evident that each 3D printer excels in unique areas catering to different user needs and preferences. The Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra stands out with its high resolution and compact design, making it an ideal choice for those focused on fine detail and precision in resin printing. Its 10K resolution and smaller print volume enable it to produce intricate models effectively, while its lightweight build enhances its portability. The inclusion of advanced print technology and power recovery features further adds to its appeal for users who prioritize performance and reliability. On the other hand, the Kobra 3 Combo is tailored for versatility and functionality in filament printing. With its larger print volume, it accommodates bigger projects and supports multi-material printing, appealing to users who require flexibility in their printing tasks. The advanced features, such as automatic bed leveling and filament drying, address common printing challenges while enhancing the overall user experience. When considering price, the Photo Mono 4 Ultra offers a more budget-friendly option without sacrificing quality, while the Kobra 3 Combo, albeit at a higher price point, provides extensive capabilities that may justify the investment for users seeking diverse material compatibility and larger build space. Ultimately, the best choice depends on the specific requirements of the user. Those focused on detailed work and resin prints may gravitate towards the Photo Mono 4 Ultra, while individuals desiring greater flexibility and larger prints may find the Kobra 3 Combo more suitable. Both printers deliver good cost-benefit ratios and robust features, making them worthy contenders in the 3D printing market for 2024. |