Compare Photo Mono 4 Ultra vs Halot Sky
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Photo Mono 4 Ultra[BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
Halot Sky |
| Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra | Buy Resin forCreality 3D Halot Sky | |
| Estimated price | $250,00 | $879,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anycubic | Creality 3D |
| Release Year | 2024 | 2021 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 153x87x165 | 192x120x200 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 231x236x430 | 340x29x550 |
| Weight [kg] | 5 | 16,5 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
| Technology | LCD | LCD |
| Screen Resolution | 10k | |
| Max Print Speed [s/layer] | 1 | 1 |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 4k |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Touchscreen 4.3'' | |
| Power Supply | ||
| Connectivity | USB | Wi-Fi |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac | |
| Date of registration in the system | 2024-12-13 | 2022-10-11 |
| Release date | 2024 | 2021 |
| Extra features | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra features 10K resolution (9024x5120) with 17x17um pixels and high light uniformity (>=90%) enabled by the COB system with Fresnel lens and uniformity algorithm. It offers a build volume of 153.4x87x165 mm and speeds up to 120 mm/h with high-performance resin. It includes assisted leveling, built-in Wi-Fi, and a redesigned platform for better adhesion and easy model removal. Additionally, it has a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. | The Creality HALOT SKY stands out with its 8.9-inch 4K monochrome display, ensuring detailed prints. Its robust construction includes dual linear rails and a ball screw on the Z-axis, offering precise movements. Equipped with an ARM Cortex-A53 Quad-Core processor and Wi-Fi, it provides a responsive and connected user experience. The flip cover saves space and the 120W UV source ensures uniform curing. In addition, the HALOT SKY supports OTA firmware updates and integration with Creality Cloud, increasing efficiency and convenience in use. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 6.3 / 10 | 1.2 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 9 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
| [BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the **Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra** and the **Creality HALOT SKY**, several key factors highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each 3D printer. **Affordability and Value**: The Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra is significantly more budget-friendly compared to the Creality HALOT SKY. This price differential plays a crucial role for hobbyists and casual users who seek an efficient yet cost-effective solution for their printing needs. **Print Specifications**: The Photo Mono 4 Ultra offers a high resolution of 10k, ensuring exceptional print quality with finer details, while the HALOT SKY, despite its solid 4k resolution, may fall short in comparison for users prioritizing ultra-high-definition prints. Both printers have similar max print speeds, but the power loss recovery feature in the Anycubic model adds an advantage, helping to preserve prints in case of interruptions. **User Experience and Features**: The design and usability of both printers cater to different preferences; the Photo Mono 4 Ultra is lighter and more compact, making it easier to manage and fit into smaller workspaces, while the HALOT SKY, with its robust construction and ARM processor, may appeal to users looking for stability and a seamless, connected experience. Additionally, the HALOT SKY’s advanced features, including OTA firmware updates and cloud integration, enhance its appeal for tech-savvy users. **Overall Assessment**: For those seeking the best cost-to-performance ratio, the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra emerges as a strong contender due to its superior resolution and affordability. In contrast, the Creality HALOT SKY could be a better choice for users who prioritize build quality, connectivity, and features over the initial investment. In conclusion, the optimal choice between these two printers hinges on the user's specific needs, balancing budget considerations against desired features and print quality. The Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra stands out for its value and quality, while the HALOT SKY appeals with its robust capabilities and advanced technology. |