Compare Photo Mono 4 Ultra vs Ender 7
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Modelo | Photo Mono 4 Ultra[BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
Ender 7[BUY Ender 7] |
Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra | Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 7 | |
Estimated price | $250,00 | $429,00 |
Manufacturer | Anycubic | Creality 3D |
Release Year | 2024 | 2021 |
Print Volume [mm] | 153x87x165 | 250x250x300 |
Printer Size [mm] | 231x236x430 | 430x460x570 |
Weight [kg] | 5 | 17,2 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,1 |
Processor | Creality CR-FDM V.2.4.S1_V101 32bits | |
Display | Touchscreen 4.3'' | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
Power Supply | 110/220V / 350W | |
Connectivity | USB | SD / USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac | Windows, Mac, Linux |
Date of registration in the system | 2024-12-13 | 2022-11-04 |
Release date | 2024 | 2021 |
Extra features | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra features 10K resolution (9024x5120) with 17x17um pixels and high light uniformity (>=90%) enabled by the COB system with Fresnel lens and uniformity algorithm. It offers a build volume of 153.4x87x165 mm and speeds up to 120 mm/h with high-performance resin. It includes assisted leveling, built-in Wi-Fi, and a redesigned platform for better adhesion and easy model removal. Additionally, it has a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. | Crealitys Ender 7 printer offers remarkable print speeds, utilizing CoreXY kinematics for precise and fast movement. With a 250x250x300mm build area, dual direct extruder, and custom hotend, the Ender 7 is capable of printing at high speeds, although quality may suffer on smaller prints. Assembly is relatively straightforward, but the machine is noisy and can get hot. Its true speed potential is most noticeable on larger prints, where it outperforms its competitors. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Hardware | 6.3 / 10 | 2.4 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Performance | 9 / 10 | 2 / 10 |
[BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] | [BUY Ender 7] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra and the Creality Ender 7, several key factors emerge that will help users make an informed decision based on their specific needs and budget. The Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra stands out with its lower price point and impressive specifications, such as a maximum print resolution of 0.01 mm, which suggests exceptional print detail. Its compact design, lightweight construction, and integrated features like assisted leveling and print resumption enhance usability, particularly for users focused on intricate designs or small-scale projects. Moreover, the introduction of Wi-Fi connectivity can be a significant convenience. On the other hand, while the Creality Ender 7 offers a larger print volume and faster printing speeds thanks to its CoreXY kinematics, it is heavier and bulkier, which may not appeal to users who require portability or have limited workspace. The assembly process is considered straightforward, but potential noise and heating issues may be a drawback for some users. Additionally, its maximum resolution is lower than that of the Photo Mono 4 Ultra, which may impact the quality of fine detail in smaller prints. In terms of cost-benefit analysis, the Photo Mono 4 Ultra achieves a higher score, indicating better value for those looking for quality prints without a hefty investment. The Ender 7's performance excels in larger prints, making it a suitable choice for projects that demand speed and volume over detail. Ultimately, the choice between these two printers should align with the user’s specific priorities: for high precision and compactness, the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra is ideal, whereas for larger prints and higher speeds, the Creality Ender 7 may be the better option despite its higher price. Users should also consider their experience level and intended applications when making their selection. |