Compare Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra vs Creality 3D Ender 5
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Model | Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra[BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
Creality 3D Ender 5[BUY Ender 5] |
| Printing Material | Resin | Filament |
| Estimated price | $250,00 | $399,00 |
| Date of registration in the system | ||
| Manufacturer | Anycubic | Creality 3D |
| Release Year | 2024 | 2020 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 153x87x165 | 220x220x300 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 231x236x430 | 485x510x552 |
| Weight [kg] | 5 | 11,8 |
| Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,1 |
| Kinematics | - | - |
| Extruder Type | - | - |
| Klipper Firmware | NO | NO |
| Input Shaping | NO | NO |
| Max Volumetric Flow [mm³/s] | - | - |
| Power Supply | 24V / 360W | |
| Connectivity | USB | SD / USB |
| Release date | 2024 | 2020 |
| Extra features | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra features 10K resolution (9024x5120) with 17x17um pixels and high light uniformity (>=90%) enabled by the COB system with Fresnel lens and uniformity algorithm. It offers a build volume of 153.4x87x165 mm and speeds up to 120 mm/h with high-performance resin. It includes assisted leveling, built-in Wi-Fi, and a redesigned platform for better adhesion and easy model removal. Additionally, it has a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. | Crealityâs Ender 5 stands out with a solid frame and a larger 220 x 220 x 300mm print volume. Its assembly is simple and quick, offering high print quality and speeds of up to 80mm/s. With a magnetic bed, it makes it easy to remove prints. Notable for being hackable and expandable, the Ender 5 continues Crealityâs innovative tradition in the affordable 3D printer market. Equipped with a 350W/24V Meanwell power supply, it heats up quickly, in addition to having efficient cable management and modified Marlin firmware. Its unique design includes dedicated stepper motors for each axis and smooth movement on the Y axis, providing more consistent and detailed prints. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 3.2 / 10 | 0.5 / 10 |
| Screen | . | . |
| Print volume | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Performance | 5 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| [BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] | [BUY Ender 5] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra and the Creality 3D Ender 5, several key factors highlight their strengths and potential drawbacks, helping potential buyers make an informed decision. The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra, with a more affordable price point, offers superior resolution and print quality, making it highly suitable for users prioritizing detail in their prints. Its compact size and lightweight design enhance ease of use and portability. The inclusion of advanced features such as a touchscreen interface, assisted leveling, Wi-Fi connectivity, and quick power recovery further adds to its appeal, particularly for those new to 3D printing or who require a reliable machine for intricate work. On the other hand, the Creality Ender 5, while priced higher, delivers a more substantial print volume and robust build quality. It is particularly advantageous for users who produce larger prints or those who appreciate a system that is hackable and upgradeable. The Ender 5’s faster print speeds and efficient heat-up time are beneficial for completing projects more swiftly. However, its relatively lower resolution and heavier build may deter those looking for high detail in smaller-scale prints. In summary, the choice between the two printers primarily depends on the user's specific needs. If budget and print detail are at the forefront, the Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra is an excellent option. Conversely, for users focusing on larger prints, sturdiness, or expansion potential, the Ender 5 could be the better investment. Ultimately, both printers offer value in their respective niches within the 3D printing market. |



