Compare Neptune 4 PRO vs Bluer
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Neptune 4 PRO |
Bluer |
| Buy Filament forElegoo Neptune 4 PRO | Buy Filament forTwoTrees Bluer | |
| Estimated price | $359,00 | $169,00 |
| Manufacturer | Elegoo | TwoTrees |
| Release Year | 2023 | 2019 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 225x225x265 | 230x230x280 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 475x445x515 | 400x410x520 |
| Weight [kg] | 8,9 | 8 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Manual |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Bowden |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 300 | 260 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 110 | 100 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 500 | 200 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PLA+, TPU, PETG, Nylon, ABS | PLA, PETG |
| Recommended slicers | Bambu Studio, Super Slicer, Cura, Prusa Slicer, Orca | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | ARM 64 bit | MKS Robin Nano V1.2 + TMC2208 |
| Display | Touchscreen 4,3'' | Touchscreen TFT 3,5'' |
| Power Supply | 310 W | 240W |
| Connectivity | USB, microSD | SD / USB |
| Operating systems | Windows, Linux, Macbook | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2024-07-02 | 2021-09-20 |
| Release date | 2023 | 2019 |
| Extra features | The Elegoo Neptune 4 Pro stands out for its advanced features, including pre-installed Klipper firmware, a dual-gear direct extruder with a 5.2:1 ratio, a high-temperature nozzle (up to 300°C), a flexible magnetic PEI platform, efficient cooling fans, and a 121-point auto-leveling system. The printer also features a 4.3-inch touchscreen interface, dual linear bars on the X and Y axes, and a segmented heated bed for energy savings. | The Bluer offers interesting features such as automatic bed leveling, a 3.5-inch color touchscreen for easy operation, and a filament sensor to prevent print failures. It has a robust metal extruder and a generous 230 x 230 x 280 mm print volume, suitable for a variety of projects. The community mentions improvements made by Two Trees based on feedback, increasing its reliability. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 3.6 / 10 | 2 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 4 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
Conclusion |
| ### Conclusion When comparing the Elegoo Neptune 4 Pro and the TwoTrees Bluer, several distinctions emerge that may influence a buyer's decision based on their specific needs and budget. The Neptune 4 Pro, although more expensive, offers advanced features and superior performance, characterized by a higher maximum nozzle temperature, faster printing speed, and automatic bed leveling. Its robust design includes a dual-gear direct extruder and efficient cooling systems, making it a suitable choice for users looking for versatility in materials and precision in prints. Additionally, the larger print volume and upgraded touchscreen interface enhance the overall user experience. On the other hand, the TwoTrees Bluer presents a more budget-friendly option, demonstrating solid reliability and a commendable set of features, including a generous print volume, automatic bed leveling, and a filament sensor. Although it lags in performance parameters compared to the Neptune 4 Pro, it still caters well to hobbyists or those new to 3D printing, providing essential functions without breaking the bank. In summary, the Elegoo Neptune 4 Pro stands out for its performance and features, making it ideal for more serious users or professionals. In contrast, the TwoTrees Bluer serves as an accessible alternative for beginners or cost-conscious individuals who still desire a functional 3D printer. The choice ultimately depends on the user's specific requirements, budget, and intended use of the 3D printer. |