Compare Mega S vs Sonic Might 4k
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Modelo | Mega S |
Sonic Might 4k |
Buy Filament forAnycubic Mega S | Buy Resin forPhrozen Sonic Might 4k | |
Estimated price | $149,00 | $1400,00 |
Manufacturer | Anycubic | Phrozen |
Release Year | 2019 | 2022 |
Print Volume [mm] | 210x210x205 | 125x220x200 |
Printer Size [mm] | 405x410x452 | 280x280x440 |
Weight [kg] | 14,5 | 8 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
Processor | 8 bits | |
Display | Touchscreen TFT 2,8'' | |
Power Supply | 12V / 300W | |
Connectivity | SD / USB | USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
Date of registration in the system | 2021-04-15 | 2023-01-08 |
Release date | 2019 | 2022 |
Extra features | The Anycubic Mega S offers a printing platform with excellent adhesion, easy removal after cooling. It has a filament sensor for a better experience with flexible materials and a multilingual and intuitive color touchscreen. Assembly is quick, requiring only 8 screws and 3 connections. It has a large build volume (210 x 210 x 205 mm), high positioning accuracy and supports a variety of materials, including TPU, PLA, ABS and wood. It stands out for its solid metal structure, superior stability, high-quality printing with layer resolution of up to 50 microns, Ultrabase for easy adhesion and removal of parts, resumption of printing after power outage, high-quality extruder for flexible filaments, suspended filament support and stable structure that reduces shaking, improving printing quality. | The Phrozen Sonic Mighty 4K printer stands out for its 9.3-inch monochrome LCD, allowing for large prints with precise details. It has a print area of ??200 x 125 x 220 mm, which is larger than competitors with similar 4K screens, although with a slight difference in pixel size. Detailed resolution is achieved thanks to its 3840 x 2400 pixel screen. Additionally, its build tray can move with precision of up to 0.01 mm, ensuring high print quality. It has a solid frame with a cooling fan and a removable cover that contains the resin odor. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
Hardware | 2 / 10 | 1.4 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 0 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Anycubic Mega S and the Phrozen Sonic Mighty 4K, several key factors should be considered to determine which printer serves best according to user needs and budget. **Price vs. Features:** The Mega S is significantly more affordable, making it an attractive option for hobbyists or newcomers to 3D printing. It offers a larger print volume and boasts reliability features such as power loss recovery and solid build quality. Conversely, the Sonic Mighty 4K, while more expensive, provides cutting-edge resolution capabilities and superior detail, which may appeal to professionals or those requiring high-fidelity prints. **Performance and Print Quality:** The Sonic Mighty 4K excels in achieving high-resolution prints with its monochrome LCD, which can yield sharp details at a level of precision that the Mega S cannot match, albeit with a slightly smaller print area. This can be vital for users focused on intricate designs or advanced modeling. **Ease of Use and Setup:** The Mega S's straightforward assembly and user-friendly interface with a touchscreen display make it more approachable for beginners. Its robust construction and versatility with various materials can be beneficial for those just starting their 3D printing journey. **Considerations for Specific Needs:** If large builds are prioritized and the user seeks a printer primarily for personal or casual use, the affordable Mega S is a solid champion. However, for professionals or enthusiasts focusing on quality and detail, despite the higher cost, the Sonic Mighty 4K presents compelling advantages. Ultimately, the choice between these two printers will hinge on individual priorities: budget and user-friendliness versus advanced capabilities and print quality. Each printer has its strengths, catering to different segments of the 3D printing community. |