Compare Mega S vs Halot R6
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Mega S |
Halot R6[BUY Halot R6] |
| Buy Filament forAnycubic Mega S | Buy Resin forCreality Halot R6 | |
| Estimated price | $149,00 | $129,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anycubic | Creality |
| Release Year | 2019 | 2024 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 210x210x205 | 130x82x160 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 405x410x452 | 235x230x395 |
| Weight [kg] | 14,5 | 5,8 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
| Processor | 8 bits | |
| Display | Touchscreen TFT 2,8'' | Touchscreen 2,8'' |
| Power Supply | 12V / 300W | 42W |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | USB drive, WiFi |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac |
| Date of registration in the system | 2021-04-15 | 2024-12-05 |
| Release date | 2019 | 2024 |
| Extra features | The Anycubic Mega S offers a printing platform with excellent adhesion, easy removal after cooling. It has a filament sensor for a better experience with flexible materials and a multilingual and intuitive color touchscreen. Assembly is quick, requiring only 8 screws and 3 connections. It has a large build volume (210 x 210 x 205 mm), high positioning accuracy and supports a variety of materials, including TPU, PLA, ABS and wood. It stands out for its solid metal structure, superior stability, high-quality printing with layer resolution of up to 50 microns, Ultrabase for easy adhesion and removal of parts, resumption of printing after power outage, high-quality extruder for flexible filaments, suspended filament support and stable structure that reduces shaking, improving printing quality. | The Creality Halot R6 offers high precision with a layer height of 0.01-0.2 mm, a printing speed of 60 mm/h, and an integral light source with over 90% uniformity. Compact and lightweight, it features a 6.08" monochrome LCD for faster curing and extended durability. Includes Wi-Fi connectivity via Creality Cloud, an intuitive touchscreen interface, and supports remote monitoring and timelapse recording with a USB camera. Ideal for beginners, its robust and user-friendly. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 0 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
| [BUY Halot R6] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Anycubic Mega S and the Creality Halot R6, several key factors emerge that can guide potential buyers in selecting the most suitable 3D printer for their needs. The Anycubic Mega S, released in 2019, offers a larger print volume, making it ideal for users looking to create larger parts or prototypes. Its robust design, solid metal structure, and power loss recovery feature provide reliability and ease of use, particularly for those working with diverse filament types. However, it is heavier and may take up more space, and its resolution, while decent, is not as refined as that of its competitor. In contrast, the Creality Halot R6, a newer model introduced in 2024, excels in precision and overall performance, featuring a maximum resolution that significantly enhances the detail of prints. Its compact, lightweight design and integration of Wi-Fi connectivity further highlight its suitability for beginners and those seeking a user-friendly experience. Additionally, the Halot R6 offers advanced features such as remote monitoring and timelapse recording, making it more versatile for modern printing needs. While the Mega S has a better cost-benefit ratio and superior hardware stability, the Halot R6 shines in performance and print quality, justifying its slightly lower price. For users focused on fine details and user-friendly functionalities, the Halot R6 would likely be the better choice. Conversely, for those needing larger print volumes and a robust build, the Mega S remains an excellent option. Ultimately, the decision between the two will depend on individual requirements concerning print size, precision, and additional features, along with consideration of price implications. |