Compare Mega S vs Halot Mage S
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Mega S |
Halot Mage S[BUY Halot Mage S] |
| Buy Filament forAnycubic Mega S | Buy Resin forCreality 3D Halot Mage S | |
| Estimated price | $149,00 | $549,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anycubic | Creality 3D |
| Release Year | 2019 | 2024 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 210x210x205 | 223x126x230 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 405x410x452 | 333x270x608 |
| Weight [kg] | 14,5 | 12 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
| Processor | 8 bits | |
| Display | Touchscreen TFT 2,8'' | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
| Power Supply | 12V / 300W | 100 W |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | USB, RJ45 Ethernet, WiFi, Creality Cloid |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2021-04-15 | 2024-09-25 |
| Release date | 2019 | 2024 |
| Extra features | The Anycubic Mega S offers a printing platform with excellent adhesion, easy removal after cooling. It has a filament sensor for a better experience with flexible materials and a multilingual and intuitive color touchscreen. Assembly is quick, requiring only 8 screws and 3 connections. It has a large build volume (210 x 210 x 205 mm), high positioning accuracy and supports a variety of materials, including TPU, PLA, ABS and wood. It stands out for its solid metal structure, superior stability, high-quality printing with layer resolution of up to 50 microns, Ultrabase for easy adhesion and removal of parts, resumption of printing after power outage, high-quality extruder for flexible filaments, suspended filament support and stable structure that reduces shaking, improving printing quality. | The Creality Halot Mage S is a resin 3D printer with a 14K (13320x5120) LCD screen and an integral 3.0 light source, ensuring precision and uniformity in layer curing. Its Dynax+ mode reaches up to 150mm/h without losing quality, while the laser printing platform improves adhesion. The HALOT OS system offers remote control via PC or cell phone, and the integrated air purifier neutralizes resin odors, making the environment more pleasant. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 0 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
| [BUY Halot Mage S] |
Conclusion |
| In evaluating the Anycubic Mega S and the Creality Halot Mage S, both 3D printers offer distinct advantages suited to different user needs and preferences. The Anycubic Mega S presents itself as a budget-friendly option, ideal for beginners and hobbyists. With a solid metal structure, reliable adhesion, and compatibility with various filament materials, it offers a robust printing experience at an accessible price point. Its features, such as power loss recovery and a user-friendly touchscreen, make it an excellent choice for those who may be new to 3D printing. However, its lower maximum resolution and older release date may limit its appeal for users seeking the latest technology or higher print quality. In contrast, the Creality Halot Mage S represents a premium option designed for those who prioritize precision and capabilities. Its advanced features, including a significantly higher resolution for more intricate designs and faster printing speeds, are appealing for serious creators or professionals. The integrated air purifier and remote connectivity options add to its convenience and usability, though it comes at a higher cost. Ultimately, the choice between these two printers hinges on the user’s specific needs. For those seeking a cost-effective entry into 3D printing, the Anycubic Mega S stands out as a capable machine. However, for users focused on advanced performance and quality, the Creality Halot Mage S offers significant advantages that justify its higher price. The cost-benefit analysis favors the Halot Mage S in terms of hardware and overall performance, while the Mega S serves as a versatile, budget-friendly alternative suitable for less demanding applications. |