Compare Mars 3 PRO vs Mega S

Comparison between the best 3D printers

Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.

Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.

3D Printer Mars 3 PRO 3D Printer Mega S
Modelo

Mars 3 PRO

Mega S

Buy Resin forElegoo Mars 3 PRO Buy Filament forAnycubic Mega S
Estimated price $300,00 $149,00
Manufacturer Elegoo Anycubic
Release Year 2022 2019
Print Volume [mm] 143x89x175 210x210x205
Printer Size [mm] 227x227x438 405x410x452
Weight [kg] 5,5 14,5
Power Loss Recovery NO YES
Maximum Resolution [mm] 0,01 0,1
Processor 8 bits
Display Touchscreen TFT 3,5'' Touchscreen TFT 2,8''
Power Supply 12V / 300W
Connectivity USB SD / USB
Operating systems Windows, Mac, Linux
Date of registration in the system 2022-11-07 2021-04-15
Release date 2022 2019
Extra features The Elegoo Mars 3 PRO printer stands out for its special features, such as its high printing resolution, which guarantees sharp and detailed prints with 35 microns. It includes a replaceable air purification module, which facilitates maintenance and improves air quality during printing. The device's LCD screen is scratch-resistant, increasing its durability, and a strong point is the uniform distribution of light, guaranteed by a Fresnel lens. This lens ensures more uniform curing of printed objects, contributing to superior print quality. With these features, the Elegoo Mars 3 PRO presents itself as a robust and efficient choice for resin 3D printing. The Anycubic Mega S offers a printing platform with excellent adhesion, easy removal after cooling. It has a filament sensor for a better experience with flexible materials and a multilingual and intuitive color touchscreen. Assembly is quick, requiring only 8 screws and 3 connections. It has a large build volume (210 x 210 x 205 mm), high positioning accuracy and supports a variety of materials, including TPU, PLA, ABS and wood. It stands out for its solid metal structure, superior stability, high-quality printing with layer resolution of up to 50 microns, Ultrabase for easy adhesion and removal of parts, resumption of printing after power outage, high-quality extruder for flexible filaments, suspended filament support and stable structure that reduces shaking, improving printing quality.
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) NO NO

Notes *

Cost-benefit 8 / 10 6 / 10
Hardware 1.4 / 10 2 / 10
Tela . .
Print volume 3 / 10 3 / 10
Performance 9 / 10 0 / 10

Conclusion

In comparing the Elegoo Mars 3 PRO and the Anycubic Mega S, several factors come into play, including price, performance, features, and usability.

The Elegoo Mars 3 PRO, while positioned at a higher price point, offers significant advantages in print quality and resolution. It is particularly well-suited for those who require detailed and sharp prints, making it an excellent choice for intricate models. Its state-of-the-art technology, such as the Fresnel lens for uniform light distribution and a replaceable air purification module, enhances both the printing experience and air quality during operations. However, it does lack power loss recovery, which could be a disadvantage in unstable power environments.

On the other hand, the Anycubic Mega S, despite being the more economical option, still provides a decent build volume and a variety of compatible materials, including PLA and ABS. Its solid metal structure, ease of assembly, and power loss recovery feature make it a practical choice for users demanding stability and dependability. However, it falls short in terms of print resolution and detail, as its maximum layer resolution is notably less refined than that of the Mars 3 PRO.

Ultimately, the decision between these two printers may hinge on the user's specific needs. If exceptional detail and resolution are paramount, and budget allows, the Elegoo Mars 3 PRO emerges as the superior option. Conversely, for a more budget-conscious consumer seeking ease of use and a reliable printer with versatile material options, the Anycubic Mega S stands as a commendable choice. The choice, thus, lies between prioritizing print quality or efficiency and cost-effectiveness, dependent on the user's printing objectives.