Compare M5C vs Toybox

Comparison between the best 3D printers

Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.

Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.

3D Printer M5C 3D Printer Toybox
Modelo

M5C

 [BUY M5C]

Toybox

 [BUY Toybox]
Buy Filament forAnkerMake M5C Buy Filament forToybox Toybox
Estimated price $399,00 $299,00
Manufacturer AnkerMake Toybox
Release Year 2023 2024
Print Volume [mm] 220x220x250 70x80x90
Printer Size [mm] 466x374x480 190x190x230
Weight [kg] 9,6 3
Power Loss Recovery YES NO
Enclosed printer NO NO
Bed Leveling Automatic Manual
Filament End Sensor YES NO
Bed type Heated
Power supply system Direct Drive Direct Drive
Standard nozzle 0,4 0,5
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] 300 210
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] 100
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] 500 60
Filament holder YES YES
Camera for supervision NO NO
Recommended filaments PLA, PETG, TPU, ABS, PA, PLA-CF, PETG-CF, PA-CF PLA
Recommended slicers AnkerMake Studio (macOS, Windows), Simplify3D, Ultimaker Cura, PrusaSlicer Toybox
Maximum Resolution [mm] 0,1 0,2
Processor
Display Touchscreen 2,4''
Power Supply 350 W
Connectivity Wi-Fi, USB-C, Bluetooth Wi-fi
Operating systems Windows, Linux e Macbook iOS, Android
Date of registration in the system 2024-09-11 2024-08-06
Release date 2023 2024
Extra features The AnkerMake M5 printer stands out for its impressive print speed, reaching up to 500mm/s. It features AI print monitoring, an integrated camera for creating timelapses, auto-leveling bed with pressure sensor, direct extruder, flexible PEI-coated build plate, and Wi-Fi and USB-C connectivity. Assembly is quick and easy, and the printer is designed to deliver high print quality and ease of use. The Toybox 3D printer is an excellent option for children and beginners. Easy to use, with intuitive setup and simplified operation via an app. The Toybox allows you to print thousands of toys and projects through a user-friendly interface. It has a removable magnetic table that makes it easy to remove printed objects. The filament is PLA, safe for children, and the printing is reliable and error-free. It also offers custom design options, allowing you to create and print drawings and photos.
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) NO NO

Notes *

Cost-benefit 7 / 10 6 / 10
Hardware 3.6 / 10 1 / 10
Tela . .
Print volume 3 / 10 3 / 10
Performance 4 / 10 0 / 10
 [BUY M5C]  [BUY Toybox]

Conclusion

In comparing the AnkerMake M5C and the Toybox 3D printers, several key factors emerge that cater to different user needs and preferences.

The AnkerMake M5C is positioned as a high-performance option, offering impressive specifications such as a larger print volume, faster printing speed, and advanced features like automatic bed leveling and a filament end sensor. Its design is more suited for experienced users and serious hobbyists looking for versatility and the ability to work with multiple filament types. Additionally, the M5C supports a high maximum nozzle and bed temperature, making it capable of printing with a wider range of materials. Its connectivity options also enhance usability, allowing for greater flexibility in operation.

On the other hand, the Toybox printer is tailored for beginners and younger users, focusing on ease of use and safety. With a simplified interface and intuitive setup, it empowers users to create toys and projects without extensive knowledge of 3D printing. The Toybox’s lightweight design and user-friendly features, such as a removable magnetic table, further promote accessibility for children and those who may be intimidated by more complex machines.

While the AnkerMake M5C offers superior performance and features for a slightly higher price, the Toybox excels in providing a more straightforward and accessible entry into 3D printing. For those who prioritize advanced capabilities and the ability to print with a variety of materials, the M5C is the better choice. Conversely, for families or beginners seeking a fun and easy-to-use printer for basic projects, the Toybox represents an excellent value.

Ultimately, the decision hinges on the user’s experience level and intended application: performance and flexibility versus simplicity and accessibility.