Compare M5C vs SV02
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | M5C[BUY M5C] |
SV02 |
Buy Filament forAnkerMake M5C | Buy Filament forSovol SV02 | |
Estimated price | $399,00 | $209,00 |
Manufacturer | AnkerMake | Sovol |
Release Year | 2023 | 2020 |
Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 280x240x300 |
Printer Size [mm] | 466x374x480 | 539x493x710 |
Weight [kg] | 9,6 | 11,86 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
Bed Leveling | Automatic | Manual |
Filament End Sensor | YES | NO |
Bed type | Heated | Heated |
Power supply system | Direct Drive | Bowden |
Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 300 | 260 |
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 110 |
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 500 | 120 |
Filament holder | YES | YES |
Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, TPU, ABS, PA, PLA-CF, PETG-CF, PA-CF | PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS |
Recommended slicers | AnkerMake Studio (macOS, Windows), Simplify3D, Ultimaker Cura, PrusaSlicer | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
Processor | ||
Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | |
Power Supply | 350 W | |
Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB-C, Bluetooth | SD / USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Linux e Macbook | Windows, Mac, Linux |
Date of registration in the system | 2024-09-11 | 2022-11-10 |
Release date | 2023 | 2020 |
Extra features | The AnkerMake M5 printer stands out for its impressive print speed, reaching up to 500mm/s. It features AI print monitoring, an integrated camera for creating timelapses, auto-leveling bed with pressure sensor, direct extruder, flexible PEI-coated build plate, and Wi-Fi and USB-C connectivity. Assembly is quick and easy, and the printer is designed to deliver high print quality and ease of use. | The Sovol SV02 is a dual extrusion 3D printer with two inputs and one output hotend, silent motherboard and 4.3" color touchscreen. It includes a tempered glass platform for glue-free adhesion, dual Z-axis for more stability, and fast heating with Mean Well power supply. It has a resume printing function and support for upgrades, such as an automatic leveling sensor. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Hardware | 3.6 / 10 | 1.8 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Performance | 4 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
[BUY M5C] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the AnkerMake M5C and the Sovol SV02 3D printers, several factors emerge that can help potential buyers decide which model better suits their needs. The AnkerMake M5C, released in 2023, emphasizes speed and user-friendly features. Its maximum printing speed of 500 mm/s is notably impressive, making it an excellent choice for those who prioritize efficiency. Features like automatic bed leveling and a filament end sensor add considerable convenience, while its direct drive system supports a wide variety of filament types, including more advanced materials. Moreover, the M5C has a modern user interface, with a touchscreen display and advanced connectivity options like Wi-Fi, USB-C, and Bluetooth. In contrast, the Sovol SV02, which has been available since 2020, offers a larger print volume, accommodating bigger projects. Although it requires manual bed leveling and lacks some of the automated features of the M5C, it still provides solid performance with dual extrusion capabilities and a stable, dual Z-axis design. Users willing to put in the extra effort for manual adjustments may find it appealing, especially considering its more budget-friendly price. Ultimately, the choice between these two printers largely hinges on the balance between budget, desired features, and intended use. The AnkerMake M5C excels in speed and innovation, targeted toward users aiming for high-efficiency printing with modern technology. Conversely, the Sovol SV02 caters to those looking for a larger build volume and a more economical option, at the expense of some advanced features. Depending on one’s specific preferences and priorities in 3D printing, either model presents a viable option. |