Compare M5C vs P1S

Comparison between the best 3D printers

Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.

Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.

3D Printer M5C 3D Printer P1S
Modelo

M5C

 [BUY M5C]

P1S

 [BUY P1S]
Buy Filament forAnkerMake M5C Buy Filament forBambu Lab P1S
Estimated price $399,00 $949,00
Manufacturer AnkerMake Bambu Lab
Release Year 2023 2023
Print Volume [mm] 220x220x250 256x256x256
Printer Size [mm] 466x374x480 389x389x458
Weight [kg] 9,6 12,95
Power Loss Recovery YES YES
Enclosed printer NO YES
Bed Leveling Automatic Automatic
Filament End Sensor YES YES
Bed type Heated Heated
Power supply system Direct Drive Direct Drive
Standard nozzle 0,4 0,4
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] 300 300
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] 100 100
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] 500 500
Filament holder YES YES
Camera for supervision NO NO
Recommended filaments PLA, PETG, TPU, ABS, PA, PLA-CF, PETG-CF, PA-CF PLA, PETG, TPU, PVA, PA, PA-CF, Nylon, PC
Recommended slicers AnkerMake Studio (macOS, Windows), Simplify3D, Ultimaker Cura, PrusaSlicer Bambu Studio, Super Slicer, Cura, Prusa Slicer, Orca
Maximum Resolution [mm] 0,1 0,1
Processor Quad ARM A7 1.2 GHz
Display Touchscreen 5''
Power Supply 350 W 350 W
Connectivity Wi-Fi, USB-C, Bluetooth Wifi, Bambu bus, Cartão SD
Operating systems Windows, Linux e Macbook Windows, Linux, Macbook
Date of registration in the system 2024-09-11 2024-04-11
Release date 2023 2023
Extra features The AnkerMake M5 printer stands out for its impressive print speed, reaching up to 500mm/s. It features AI print monitoring, an integrated camera for creating timelapses, auto-leveling bed with pressure sensor, direct extruder, flexible PEI-coated build plate, and Wi-Fi and USB-C connectivity. Assembly is quick and easy, and the printer is designed to deliver high print quality and ease of use. The Bambu Lab P1S stands out for its “out-of-the-box” practicality, eliminating the need for manual adjustments with automatic calibrations such as bed leveling and vibration compensation. It features multicolor printing capability through the AMS system, allowing up to 16 colors when connecting four AMS units. With an advanced control algorithm, the P1S offers fast printing speeds without sacrificing quality. Equipped with modern features such as filament end sensor, semi-automatic belt tension, direct extruder, welded frame and all-metal hotend, along with a fully enclosed chamber, the P1S promotes a superior printing experience, supporting a wide range of materials.
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) NO YES

Notes *

Cost-benefit 7 / 10 7 / 10
Hardware 3.6 / 10 7.2 / 10
Tela . .
Print volume 3 / 10 4 / 10
Performance 4 / 10 4 / 10
 [BUY M5C]  [BUY P1S]

Conclusion

In comparing the AnkerMake M5C and the Bambu Lab P1S, both 3D printers released in 2023, it is clear that each offers unique strengths catering to different user needs.

The AnkerMake M5C is a more budget-friendly option, providing impressive print speeds, ease of assembly, and a range of supported filament types. Its compact design, lighter weight, and user-friendly features, such as automatic bed leveling and direct drive system, make it a great choice for hobbyists or those new to 3D printing. However, it lacks an enclosed build chamber which could limit the range of materials that can be effectively printed.

On the other hand, the Bambu Lab P1S, while priced higher, offers advanced features such as a fully enclosed chamber, superior automatic calibration processes, and multicolor printing capabilities through the AMS system. These features enhance its versatility and effectiveness in handling a wider array of filaments, making it suitable for more complex projects and professional use.

Though both printers received a similar cost-benefit score, the P1S's performance and hardware capabilities suggest it is better suited for users who demand high-quality prints with more advanced functionalities. Conversely, the M5C stands out for casual users looking for a reliable and efficient entry-level printer without making significant financial investments.

Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the user's specific requirements, budget considerations, and plans for utilizing the printer's capabilities.