Compare M5C vs Adventurer 5M PRO
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | M5C[BUY M5C] |
Adventurer 5M PRO |
| Buy Filament forAnkerMake M5C | Buy Filament forFlashforge Adventurer 5M PRO | |
| Estimated price | $399,00 | $599,00 |
| Manufacturer | AnkerMake | Flashforge |
| Release Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 220x220x220 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 466x374x480 | 380x400x453 |
| Weight [kg] | 9,6 | 10,8 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | YES |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 300 | 280 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 110 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 500 | 600 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, TPU, ABS, PA, PLA-CF, PETG-CF, PA-CF | PLA, PETG, TPU, PLA-CF, PETG-CF |
| Recommended slicers | AnkerMake Studio (macOS, Windows), Simplify3D, Ultimaker Cura, PrusaSlicer | FlashPrint 5 |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Touchscreen 4,3'' | |
| Power Supply | 350 W | 350 W |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB-C, Bluetooth | Wifi / Ethernet / USB |
| Operating systems | Windows, Linux e Macbook | Windows, Linux, Macbook |
| Date of registration in the system | 2024-09-11 | 2024-07-09 |
| Release date | 2023 | 2023 |
| Extra features | The AnkerMake M5 printer stands out for its impressive print speed, reaching up to 500mm/s. It features AI print monitoring, an integrated camera for creating timelapses, auto-leveling bed with pressure sensor, direct extruder, flexible PEI-coated build plate, and Wi-Fi and USB-C connectivity. Assembly is quick and easy, and the printer is designed to deliver high print quality and ease of use. | The Flashforge Adventurer 5M PRO features advanced features such as a CoreXY motion system, direct drive extruder, print speeds of up to 600mm/s and maximum acceleration of 20,000mm/s². It features fast nozzle changes, automatic calibration, active vibration compensation, camera monitoring, time-lapse video, HEPA and carbon filters for particles and VOCs, and an intuitive 4.3-inch touchscreen interface. Ideal for printing materials such as PLA, PETG, ABS and TPU. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 3.6 / 10 | 4.5 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 4 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| [BUY M5C] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the AnkerMake M5C and the Flashforge Adventurer 5M PRO, both printers showcase impressive features, yet they cater to slightly different user needs and preferences. The AnkerMake M5C stands out with its faster maximum print speed and a larger print volume, making it an excellent choice for users who prioritize speed and capacity in their projects. Its user-friendly setup, automatic bed leveling, and connectivity options also make it attractive for hobbyists who prefer easy operation and convenience. The lower price point further enhances its appeal to budget-conscious buyers seeking solid performance. On the other hand, the Flashforge Adventurer 5M PRO offers superior performance, particularly with its advanced motion system, higher acceleration, and features like an intuitive touchscreen and air filtration system, which make it a great option for more demanding and precise printing tasks. The enclosed design is beneficial for users working with temperature-sensitive materials, ensuring better print quality. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on specific needs: the AnkerMake M5C is ideal for users prioritizing speed and ease of use at a more accessible price, while the Flashforge Adventurer 5M PRO is tailored for those seeking advanced capabilities and quality in their 3D printing endeavors, with a willingness to invest more. Both printers receive commendable scores in the cost-benefit category, demonstrating they are worthwhile options within their respective price ranges. |