Compare M5 vs Ender 3 V3
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | M5 |
Ender 3 V3[BUY Ender 3 V3] |
| Buy Filament forAnkerMake M5 | Buy Filament forCreality Ender 3 V3 | |
| Estimated price | $497,00 | $389,00 |
| Manufacturer | AnkerMake | Creality |
| Release Year | 2023 | 2024 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 235x235x250 | 220x220x250 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 502x438x470 | 358x374x498 |
| Weight [kg] | 12,6 | 7,12 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 300 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 110 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 500 | 600 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | YES | YES |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, ABS | PLA, PETG e TPU (95A+) |
| Recommended slicers | AnkerMake Studio (macOS, Windows), Simplify3D, Ultimaker Cura, PrusaSlicer | Creality Print, Cura 5.0 ou superior, Prusa Slicer e Simplify3D |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
| Processor | 32 Bits | |
| Display | Touchscreen 4,3'' | 4.3" HD touch screen |
| Power Supply | 350 W | 350 W |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB-C, OTA Upgrade | USB drive, LAN, Creality Cloud APP |
| Operating systems | Windows, Linux, Macbook | Windows, Linux, Macbook |
| Date of registration in the system | 2024-07-08 | 2024-03-01 |
| Release date | 2023 | 2024 |
| Extra features | The AnkerMake M5 printer stands out for its impressive print speed, reaching up to 500mm/s. It features AI print monitoring, an integrated camera for creating timelapses, auto-leveling bed with pressure sensor, direct extruder, flexible PEI-coated build plate, and Wi-Fi and USB-C connectivity. Assembly is quick and easy, and the printer is designed to deliver high print quality and ease of use. | The Ender 3 V3 redefines 3D printing with its CoreXZ system, reaching speeds of up to 600mm/s, and stable metal construction with cast parts. It stands out for its powerful direct extrusion, quick-change tri-metal nozzle, and two powerful fans for instant cooling. Equipped with automatic calibration, it makes leveling and adjustments easy, promoting a fast and reliable printing experience with various materials. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 4.5 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 4 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| [BUY Ender 3 V3] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the AnkerMake M5 and the Creality Ender 3 V3, both printers present compelling features catering to different user needs in the 3D printing landscape. The AnkerMake M5, released in 2023, is slightly more expensive but showcases remarkable printing speed up to 500mm/s, along with AI print monitoring and a user-friendly interface. Its touchscreen and diverse connectivity options, including Wi-Fi and USB-C, enhance the overall user experience. Additionally, the M5's strong focus on print quality and ease of assembly makes it a solid choice for those seeking convenience without sacrificing performance. On the other hand, the Ender 3 V3, scheduled for release soon in 2024, boasts a slightly lower price while offering an impressive maximum printing speed of 600mm/s and a robust metal construction. Its quick-change nozzle feature and efficient cooling system position it as a reliable option for users looking to maximize productivity. The Ender 3 V3 also simplifies the calibration process, making it advantageous for both beginners and experienced users. Ultimately, the decision between these two models hinges on specific user preferences. The AnkerMake M5 appeals to those who value rapid printing capabilities and advanced monitoring features, while the Ender 3 V3 may attract users prioritizing speed and robust construction at a lower price point. Both printers score similarly in cost-benefit analysis, making either a strong choice in their respective niches of the market. |