Compare LK4 vs Photon M3 Max

Comparison between the best 3D printers

Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.

Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.

3D Printer LK4 3D Printer Photon M3 Max
Modelo

LK4

Photon M3 Max
Buy Filament forLonger 3D LK4 Buy Resin forAnycubic Photon M3 Max
Estimated price $200,00 $960,00
Manufacturer Longer 3D Anycubic
Release Year 2019 2022
Print Volume [mm] 220x220x250 298x164x300
Printer Size [mm] 402x425x505 400x408x596
Weight [kg] 7,8 21
Power Loss Recovery YES NO
Maximum Resolution [mm] 0,1 0,01
Processor 8 bits
Display Touchscreen TFT 2,8'' Display touchscreen 4,3''
Power Supply 12V / 360W 150 W
Connectivity SD / USB USB / Wi-Fi
Operating systems Windows, Mac, Linux Windows, Mac, Linux
Date of registration in the system 2021-04-15 2023-01-19
Release date 2019 2022
Extra features The Longer LK4 is a versatile 3D printer capable of working with a wide range of filaments, such as PLA, ABS, TPU, copper, wood and carbon fiber, thanks to its 0.4mm nozzle and heated bed up to 110°C. With a printing accuracy of between 0.05-0.4mm, it stands out for its solid construction with an aluminum frame, weighing around 7kg, and a robust 24V and 15A power supply. The kit includes an Allen key, a 7/10 key, a microSD card with USB adapter, a spatula, cable ties, a power cable, 5m of filament and a spare filament end sensor. Assembly is simplified, with around 90% of the equipment pre-assembled, and detailed instructions assist in the process. Special features include print recovery after power failure, a filament end sensor, a super-adhesive printing surface and an intuitive color touchscreen display. The design features smooth profiles for easy assembly, and the position of the filament holder optimizes the filament path to the extruder. The LK4 is a solid choice for 3D printing enthusiasts looking for quality and versatility. The Anycubic Photon M3 Max printer stands out for its large build volume of 298 x 164 x 300 mm, allowing the printing of large and detailed models. It has a 13.6-inch 7K monochrome screen, offering XY resolution of 46 microns, ensuring high-precision prints. It includes an innovative automatic resin refill system and a frosted glass-style FEP blade, improving part release. Its design includes a two-part acrylic cover, facilitating internal access, and a printing platform with aluminum side handles for easy handling.
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) NO NO

Notes *
Cost-benefit 7 / 10 7 / 10
Hardware 2 / 10 4 / 10
Tela . .
Print volume 3 / 10 3 / 10
Performance 1 / 10 9 / 10

Conclusion
In comparing the Longer 3D LK4 and the Anycubic Photon M3 Max, it becomes clear that each printer has its strengths tailored to different user needs and preferences.

The Longer 3D LK4 is positioned as an affordable entry-level option. It offers versatility in filament compatibility, a reliable build, power loss recovery, and user-friendly features that make it suitable for beginners and hobbyists. Its relatively simple setup, solid construction, and decent printing accuracy make it an attractive choice for those who value cost-effectiveness and versatility in their 3D printing endeavors.

On the contrary, the Anycubic Photon M3 Max, while significantly more expensive, presents itself as a high-end option with impressive specifications, including a large build volume, exceptionally high print resolution, and innovative features like an automatic resin refill system. This model is better suited for advanced users or professionals who require precision and the ability to produce larger, intricate prints.

In conclusion, the decision between these two models ultimately hinges on the user's specific needs and budgetary considerations. If you are a hobbyist seeking an affordable, reliable printer with a degree of versatility, the LK4 stands out as a solid choice. Meanwhile, if your priority lies in high-precision printing and larger model capabilities, the Photon M3 Max is worth the premium, especially for serious enthusiasts or professional applications. Each printer has its own cost-benefit balance, making either a valid option depending on user requirements.