Compare LK4 X vs M5C
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | LK4 X |
M5C[BUY M5C] |
Buy Filament forLonger 3D LK4 X | Buy Filament forAnkerMake M5C | |
Estimated price | $299,00 | $399,00 |
Manufacturer | Longer 3D | AnkerMake |
Release Year | 2022 | 2023 |
Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 220x220x250 |
Printer Size [mm] | 465x485x615 | 466x374x480 |
Weight [kg] | 9,8 | 9,6 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
Bed type | Heated | Heated |
Power supply system | Bowden | Direct Drive |
Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 250 | 300 |
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 100 |
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 120 | 500 |
Filament holder | YES | YES |
Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
Recommended filaments | PLA, TPU, ABS, PETG | PLA, PETG, TPU, ABS, PA, PLA-CF, PETG-CF, PA-CF |
Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r | AnkerMake Studio (macOS, Windows), Simplify3D, Ultimaker Cura, PrusaSlicer |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
Processor | 8 bits | |
Display | Touchscreen TFT 4,3'' | |
Power Supply | 12V / 320W | 350 W |
Connectivity | SD / USB | Wi-Fi, USB-C, Bluetooth |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Linux e Macbook |
Date of registration in the system | 2021-04-15 | 2024-09-11 |
Release date | 2022 | 2023 |
Extra features | Longer LK4 X offers intelligent 16-point auto-leveling and dual direct-gear extruders for precise filament control, compatible with multiple materials. It features an ultra-quiet 32-bit motherboard and open-source firmware, promoting creative freedom. Its PEI film platform ensures strong adhesion and easy model removal. Includes resume printing functions and filament out-of-stock protection. Assembly is simple, with 95% pre-assembled. It has a 4.3-inch touch screen, dual fan kit, low power consumption, manual belt tensioners and improved Teflon tube. | The AnkerMake M5 printer stands out for its impressive print speed, reaching up to 500mm/s. It features AI print monitoring, an integrated camera for creating timelapses, auto-leveling bed with pressure sensor, direct extruder, flexible PEI-coated build plate, and Wi-Fi and USB-C connectivity. Assembly is quick and easy, and the printer is designed to deliver high print quality and ease of use. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Hardware | 2.8 / 10 | 3.2 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 1 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
[BUY M5C] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Longer 3D LK4 X and the AnkerMake M5C 3D printers, it is evident that both models have their unique strengths and weaknesses, catering to different user needs and preferences. The **Longer 3D LK4 X** is a more budget-friendly option with solid features, such as intelligent auto-leveling, dual gear extruders, and compatibility with a range of materials. It excels in user-friendly assembly, making it a good choice for beginners. While it offers decent print quality, its performance lags behind competitors, especially when it comes to maximum print speed. Conversely, the **AnkerMake M5C** offers impressive printing speed paired with advanced features like AI monitoring and Wi-Fi connectivity, enhancing the user experience. With a robust build and the ability to handle various filament types, it is positioned as a more premium option. Its direct drive system and high printing speed make it ideal for users looking for efficiency without compromising quality. Considering price alongside performance and features, the AnkerMake M5C emerges as a better investment for those who prioritize speed and connectivity, while the Longer 3D LK4 X remains a competent choice for budget-conscious users who still want reliable quality. Ultimately, your choice should hinge on your specific needs, whether you seek speed, advanced features, or cost-effectiveness. |