Compare Kobra vs Toybox
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Kobra |
Toybox[BUY Toybox] |
| Buy Filament forAnycubic Kobra | Buy Filament forToybox Toybox | |
| Estimated price | $259,00 | $299,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anycubic | Toybox |
| Release Year | 2022 | 2024 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 70x80x90 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 486x430x486 | 190x190x230 |
| Weight [kg] | 7 | 3 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Manual |
| Filament End Sensor | NO | NO |
| Bed type | Heated | |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,5 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 210 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 110 | |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 180 | 60 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS | PLA |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker | Toybox |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,2 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Touchscreen 2,4'' |
| Power Supply | 110/220V / 400W | |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | Wi-fi |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | iOS, Android |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-09 | 2024-08-06 |
| Release date | 2022 | 2024 |
| Extra features | The Anycubic Kobra features automatic bed leveling and a direct extruder for easy filament handling. The print bed is coated with PEI on a flexible steel plate, improving adhesion and making prints easier to remove. The printer features sensorless homing and is designed to be easily disassembled for easy maintenance and customization. | The Toybox 3D printer is an excellent option for children and beginners. Easy to use, with intuitive setup and simplified operation via an app. The Toybox allows you to print thousands of toys and projects through a user-friendly interface. It has a removable magnetic table that makes it easy to remove printed objects. The filament is PLA, safe for children, and the printing is reliable and error-free. It also offers custom design options, allowing you to create and print drawings and photos. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2.1 / 10 | 0.9 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
| [BUY Toybox] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Anycubic Kobra and the Toybox 3D printers, several factors must be considered, including features, print volume, usability, and cost-effectiveness. The Anycubic Kobra excels in its larger print volume, automatic bed leveling, and a higher maximum printing speed, making it a suitable choice for more advanced users or those looking to create larger projects. Its compatibility with various filament types and support for multiple operating systems increase its versatility, appealing to hobbyists and professionals alike. The inclusion of features like power loss recovery and a more robust build highlights its focus on performance and reliability. On the other hand, the Toybox targets a niche market of children and beginners, prioritizing simplicity and safety. Its intuitive app interface allows for easy operation and provides access to a library of pre-designed toys and projects, hence streamlining the printing process for novices. However, its smaller print volume and manual bed leveling may be limiting for users desiring more complex or larger prints. The Toybox's user-friendly design makes it a perfect educational tool, but it lacks some advanced features present in the Kobra. Overall, the Anycubic Kobra offers better value in terms of performance, versatility, and automation, making it the preferable option for users with more demanding printing needs. In contrast, the Toybox serves as an excellent entry-level device suitable for casual users or educational settings, focused on fun and simplicity rather than advanced functionality. The decision ultimately hinges on the user's specific needs and intended use, whether for more serious projects or for casual, playful exploration. |