Compare Kobra vs S5
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Kobra |
S5 |
| Buy Filament forAnycubic Kobra | Buy Filament forUltimaker S5 | |
| Estimated price | $259,00 | $6950,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anycubic | Ultimaker |
| Release Year | 2022 | 2021 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 330x340x300 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 486x430x486 | 495x585x780 |
| Weight [kg] | 7 | 20,6 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | YES |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | NO | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Bowden |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 280 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 110 | 140 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 180 | 80 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS | PLA, ABS, PETG, PC, Nylon, Tritan |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker | Cura |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Display touchscreen 4,7'' |
| Power Supply | 110/220V / 400W | 110/220V / 500W |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | USB / Wi-Fi |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-09 | 2022-11-08 |
| Release date | 2022 | 2021 |
| Extra features | The Anycubic Kobra features automatic bed leveling and a direct extruder for easy filament handling. The print bed is coated with PEI on a flexible steel plate, improving adhesion and making prints easier to remove. The printer features sensorless homing and is designed to be easily disassembled for easy maintenance and customization. | The Ultimaker S5 stands out for its easy loading and unloading of materials, automatic bed leveling and excellent print quality with resolutions from 60 to 400 microns. It has dual extruders, interchangeable print cores, advanced connectivity with Wi-Fi and LAN, and intuitive software. It includes a Wi-Fi camera for monitoring, a removable glass bed, and a large build volume, making it ideal for professional and creative environments. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 2 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2.4 / 10 | 4.2 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Anycubic Kobra and the Ultimaker S5, it's evident that both printers serve different target audiences and use cases, influenced heavily by their price points. The Anycubic Kobra emerges as a highly cost-effective option, offering essential features such as automatic bed leveling, direct drive extrusion, and a respectable print speed. Its compact design, lower weight, and heated bed make it an excellent choice for hobbyists or those new to 3D printing, especially considering the price point. While it supports a variety of filaments, its limitations in build volume and lack of advanced features such as a filament sensor or an enclosed frame may restrict its use for more complex projects. On the other hand, the Ultimaker S5 caters to professionals and serious enthusiasts with its robust build quality, larger print volume, and enhanced features like dual extruders and advanced connectivity options. It showcases superior materials compatibility and advanced print resolution capabilities, making it suitable for intricate designs and multiple materials. However, these advantages come at a significantly higher cost, which may not be justifiable for casual users or those on a tight budget. In conclusion, the Anycubic Kobra represents a strong value for beginners or those seeking affordable solutions, while the Ultimaker S5 stands as a premium investment for those requiring higher performance, versatility, and professional-level output. Ultimately, the choice between these two printers should hinge on the user’s specific needs, budget constraints, and intended usage. |