Compare Kobra vs Neptune 3 PRO
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Kobra |
Neptune 3 PRO |
| Buy Filament forAnycubic Kobra | Buy Filament forElegoo Neptune 3 PRO | |
| Estimated price | $259,00 | $230,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anycubic | Elegoo |
| Release Year | 2022 | 2022 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 225x225x280 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 486x430x486 | 445x515x475 |
| Weight [kg] | 7 | 8,1 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | NO | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 260 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 110 | 100 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 180 | 80 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS | PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker e outros |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
| Power Supply | 110/220V / 400W | 250 |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-09 | 2023-03-02 |
| Release date | 2022 | 2022 |
| Extra features | The Anycubic Kobra features automatic bed leveling and a direct extruder for easy filament handling. The print bed is coated with PEI on a flexible steel plate, improving adhesion and making prints easier to remove. The printer features sensorless homing and is designed to be easily disassembled for easy maintenance and customization. | The Elegoo Neptune 3 Pro printer stands out for its easy assembly and automatic bed leveling, ideal for different levels of users. Equipped with a direct-drive extruder and dual gears, it offers excellent adhesion to slippery materials such as TPU. It incorporates dual screws on the Z-axis, ensuring stable prints, and features an integrated task light for improved visibility. With a PEI-coated build plate and a detachable touchscreen, it combines functionality and convenience. The printer also features an efficient cooling system, filament sensor and a simplified user interface. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2.4 / 10 | 3.2 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
Conclusion |
| In summary, both the Anycubic Kobra and the Elegoo Neptune 3 Pro are compelling choices in the budget-friendly 3D printer segment, each offering unique features that cater to different user preferences. The Anycubic Kobra, priced slightly higher, boasts a slightly larger print volume and a higher maximum printing speed, making it potentially more versatile for varied projects. Its design emphasizes ease of maintenance and customization, appealing to more experienced users who appreciate the ability to modify their setup. On the other hand, the Elegoo Neptune 3 Pro, with a lower price point, emphasizes user-friendliness through easy assembly and superior adhesion capabilities due to its dual-geared extruder. It also features a filament end sensor, which adds a layer of convenience for less experienced users. Its advanced cooling system and stable Z-axis contribute to print quality, making it suitable for users looking for reliability and ease of use. Considering the overall value, both printers score similarly in cost-benefit analysis, hardware functionality, and performance metrics, indicating that either choice is valid depending on specific needs and preferences. Users looking for performance speed may lean towards the Kobra, while those prioritizing a seamless user experience may find the Neptune 3 Pro more appealing. Ultimately, the decision hinges on individual priorities regarding speed, ease of use, and specific project requirements. |